She's downright vicious in her criticism of the speech.
Yes, some people have mentioned that she's been kind of marginalized for awhile now. I won't say I was ever a big fan of hers (well, since her Reagan days), but I thought she was okay; however, this article makes her look spiteful and petty.
I thought she was downright delicate in, as she put it, "reluctantly" disliking the speech. It's pretty amazing on a day when I would have bet good money she'd publish a moony, fawning gush-o-rama essay lauding every aspect. I don't remember ever seeing her this skeptical of this administration. I guess she didn't vote for Wilson. (I know, she's not THAT old.)
Some of us have a hard time dealing with the fact that the world is smaller and unless conditions elsewhere improve big time, we'll be under terrorist attack for the foreseeable future. GW's speech laid out a plan for avoiding nuking millions of Muslims, but we'll have to see how it plays out. The recent New Jersey Coptic Christian murders weren't helpful.