Because Noonan is actually commenting on the substance of the speech. If Noonan said that Bush's speech was all wrong because he was just jealous of Clinton then I'd have a problem with her too.
Its fair to point out where she is wrong with her analysis, but its not fair to make baseless allegations about her motivations or her character. How are these accusations any different than when liberals say that Bush's motivation for invading Iraq was finish the job his daddy couldn't? That is how they "feel" so I guess we should applaud them when they do it.
As conservatives, we should be above personal attacks and be able to discuss substance rather than the person - especially when that person is one of our own.
Stop already. Most posters have more than adequately offered more reasons for their opinion of Noonan's column than she offered for her opinion of Bush's speech.
I won't bother rehashing all of it but perhaps it would behoove you to re-read this thread before you dare to lecture me again.