Stop already. Most posters have more than adequately offered more reasons for their opinion of Noonan's column than she offered for her opinion of Bush's speech.
I won't bother rehashing all of it but perhaps it would behoove you to re-read this thread before you dare to lecture me again.
I've read it and you keep posting the same old falsehoods. Liberals attack Bush in this exact same way all the time and we hate it. The liberals also offer up reasons for their opinion on Bush's policies - does that make it ok with you?
No one has "more than adequately offered up reasons" to attack her motivation or character. I too believe her "too much God" section was faulty, but so what? That was only a very tiny part of her column.
The fact of the matter is that no one knows what her motivations were and if they claim they do then they're lying. She offered up her analysis - that's all.