[Michael_Michaelangelo]

To get back to this particular article, can any of the ID people on this list tell me what the scientific benefit of teaching ID in high school would be other than saying evolution is either wrong or incomplete.

Sure! Start here: Teach the Controversy

Dr. Meyer cites 5 reasons.

[Purple GOPer]

All five of his suggestions support the proposition "that Ohio not require students to know the scientific evidence and arguments for the theory of intelligent design, at least not yet." Hence the name of his web page Teach the Controversy.

As I said in my earlier post I am looking for the scientific benefits to high schoolers for teaching Intelligent Design not reasons why evolution may be wrong.