Posted on 01/20/2005 12:53:41 AM PST by kattracks
“I am willing to love all mankind, except an American.”--Samuel Johnson.
“America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.” --Oscar Wilde.
“Why do they hate us?” The question seems to be on everyone’s lips these days, and everybody seems to have an opinion. According to some observers, people throughout the world simply, “hate our democracy.” According to others the United States sides with Israel against the Palestinian people, thus incurring their justifiable wrath. In Europe it is common to assert that Americans act like arrogant “cowboys,” and that we are religious fanatics attempting to impose our ways upon the rest of the world. Radicals and even moderates in Latin America insist that the United States is responsible for the squalor so common in that region. Throughout the world the consensus of opinion seems to be that the United States has constructed an empire that snuffs out the aspirations of its victims. This has given rise in recent years to a wave of paranoid hatred of the United States. But few seem to know that such loathing of America is nothing new.
Long before the United States was founded, Barry and Judith Colp Rubin inform us in their new book, Hating America: A History, enlightened Europeans were convinced that America was inferior to the Old World and that nothing good would ever come of it. During the eighteenth century European intellectuals attempted to explain why no great civilization had arisen on American shores (the Incas and the Aztecs did not count) as it had across the Atlantic. The greatest biologist and naturalist of his time, Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, was convinced that climate was the critical factor in human development. Although he had never been to America, he read a great deal about the severe blizzards of New England and the heat of the tropics and concluded that it was impossible for civilized life to thrive there. In fact, he was convinced that life degenerated in American conditions. Without any evidence whatsoever, he contended that animals in America were smaller than their European counterparts. The American mountain lion for example, was “smaller, weaker, and more cowardly than the real lion.” He even held that animals such as horses, goats and dogs which had crossed the Atlantic to America diminished in stature after they arrived!
What was true of animals, naturally was also true of humans. Accordingly, Buffon wrote that the American Indian “is feeble in his organs of generation; . . . has neither body hair . . . nor ardor for his female . . . .” In terms similar to those often used by anti-American critics two hundred years later, he concluded that their “heart is frozen, their society cold, their empire cruel.”
The Rubins explain that Buffon was no exception in his bizarre estimation of America. The great French philosopher Voltaire echoed his opinions. Another eighteenth century popularizer of anti-American views was Cornelius DePauw of the Netherlands who contended in his popular 1768 book, Philosophical Research on the Americans, that everything across the Atlantic was “either degenerate or monstrous.” Immanuel Kant wrote in 1775 that Americans were “too weak for hard work . . . incapable of all culture, in fact even lower than the Negro.” So many European intellectuals accepted and repeated these and other similar claims that they formed the European consensus about America. In response to the prevalence of views such as these Benjamin Franklin wrote his Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, an essay demonstrating that Americans were not sickly, that the population was fertile and growing more rapidly than that of England. Thomas Jefferson’s famous Notes on the State of Virginia is an explicit defense of native creatures. American bears, he explained, were as twice as big as old world varieties, and the fossilized remains of American elephants were enormous.
Critics were not deterred however. Nikolas Lenau, a Hungarian poet went so far as to complain that he could find no nightingales or other songbirds in America. This he thought was emblematic of the region’s spiritual poverty. Unlike many European critics, Lenau had at least traveled to America in the 1830s, but he became ill, lost money in a land speculation scheme, and was embittered by his experience. He later wrote that “Americans are shopkeepers with souls that stink towards heaven. They are dead for all spiritual life . . . . The nightingale is right when he does not want to come to these louts.”
This enlightening new book places contemporary hatred of America in historical context by describing the trajectory of anti-Americanism over the course of three centuries. According to the Rubins, during the first phase of anti-Americanism, European intellectuals blamed the inferiority of America on the natural environment. During the second phase, which began with the Revolutionary era, they placed blame for American degeneracy upon the people. Even in Jefferson’s day, Americans were after all, the descendents of a polyglot collection of Europe’s criminals, outcasts, religious cranks, and failures—in short, the scum of European society. Furthermore, they were rebels who, having proclaimed the virtues of the common man, had rejected monarchy, the only system of government for which mankind had ever proven suitable. It was impossible that such a people could make a successful nation. European intellectuals dripped contempt as they discussed the United States. The democratic experiment across the Atlantic could not possibly last.
Most European critics were children of privilege, born into a class hierarchy they believed was the natural order of any society. They believed that all the benefits of culture, literature, the arts, poetry and the opera were the work of such an aristocracy of breeding. Yet Americans not only insisted on the revolutionary doctrine of equality, but practiced it. Americans refused to defer to their betters. Not only did Americans have offensive table manners, but they were filthy, crude and violent, prone as European visitors noted to knife fights, duels, and lynching. Europeans constantly complained that American women talked too much and didn’t know their place. Some sarcastically referred to the United States as a “paradise for women.” Even children were allowed to run wild without adequate discipline. The habit that repulsed them the most was, as the British traveler Francis Trollope put it, “the remorseless spitting of Americans.” With their eyes focused determinedly on the bottom line, Americans would never produce a culture worthy of note. Degradation was the natural, indeed the inevitable tendency of democracy.
What most bothered European intellectuals about Americans was that they neither appreciated the arts nor deferred to a refined upper class. In short, they refused to recognize their own inferiority and the natural superiority of the learned. To Americans, the latter were merely effete snobs unwilling to get their hands dirty with a little honest sweat. In 1824 a Jacksonian campaign slogan that ridiculed the highly educated John Quincy Adams expressed their contempt. According to the Democrats of that year, “Adams writes. Jackson fights!” Amidst the democratic mob, there was no place for an intellectual elite, certainly not in politics. One hundred-fifty years later little had changed as American politicians from George Wallace to Spiro Agnew made sport of “pointy-headed intellectuals,” and “eggheads” like Adlai Stevenson. Even in the twenty-first century, Americans prefer a plain talking Texas cowboy who expresses himself in sentence fragments to a Harvard educated liberal who speaks in nuanced paragraphs.
Through the middle of the nineteenth century few critics worried much about the impact of America because they knew it could not last. At most, the United States might be an obnoxious model that appealed to the lower orders of European society--a frightening prospect in itself. But when the Confederate states seceded from the Union igniting the Civil War in 1861, they were convinced that their predictions were coming true. When however, the Union triumph demonstrated that the nation was a permanent feature of the international landscape, they began to fear the impact of the United States. The third phase of anti-Americanism had begun. By the turn of the century, as the monster across the Atlantic began to out-produce the great powers of Europe, and compete with them in the imperial arena, some began to fear that the United States might at some time in the future impose its dreadful system upon them. Worse, their own people might prefer the boorish American mass consumption society to the cultured but sluggish class societies of traditional Europe. In short, the elites of “old Europe” feared “Americanization.”
During the nineteenth century anti-Americanism was an intellectual orientation of both the conservative right which loathed the “masses,” and of the romantic left which simultaneously championed and feared the “dangerous classes.” With the Bolshevik Revolution anti-Americanism acquired a state sponsor. Hostility to capitalism merged with hostility to the United States in the torrent of propaganda sponsored by the Soviet Union throughout most of its history. Fascists on the right conflated anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism. Accordingly one Nazi propagandist commented that “Uncle Sam has been transformed into Uncle Shylock.” Hitler himself once asked a friend, “What is America, but millionaires, beauty queens, stupid records, and Hollywood?” Demonstrating that he had accepted Buffon’s degeneracy theory, Hitler told another friend, “Transfer [a German] to Miami and you make a degenerate out of him—in other words—an American.”
During the forty-five years or so of the Cold War, western European anti-Americanism was muted because that region depended upon the United States for its defense against the Soviet Union. It was muted everywhere that is except in France, which has always been a prolific source of anti-American bile. But with the collapse of the Soviet Union and its dreary empire, hysterical fears of American “hyperpower” have arisen once again. After all, without the Soviet Union to restrain the Americans, what is to prevent the United States from extending its repugnant culture, not to mention its economic and military hegemony everywhere? Intellectuals throughout the world who embraced socialism during the Cold War, have embraced anti-Americanism as their new ideology in the wake of the Soviet collapse.
In a series of persuasive chapters, the Rubins describe anti-Americanism as it metastasized first throughout Latin America and then the Middle East, where it has acquired new state sponsors who use it to shift blame for the failures of Islamic societies to come to terms with modernity. The Rubins find that “third world” intellectuals have generally adapted old anti-American themes to the new circumstances of the post Cold War order. It is worth noting that the authors fail to discuss the emergence since the Vietnam War of American
anti-Americanism, a disconcerting yet pervasive aspect of our contemporary intellectual life. It is however, a phenomenon which could be easily explained within the intellectual framework the Rubins adopt. Nevertheless, Hating America is an otherwise comprehensive guide to the development and spread of yet another paranoid ideology—one they note bears a disquieting similarity to anti-Semitism, its ancient and evil sibling.
Richard B. Speed is a Lecturer at the Department of History, California State University at Hayward.
FR isn't in London, Mr. Brit!
What was the last Bond film? Or Master and Commander? Or Harry Potter?
Don't sell yourself short in the arena of "cultural imperialism" :-)
I think it's time the US stopped playing World Babysitter and World ATM machine. After all the criticsim for Iraq, if people want to slaughter each other by the thousands, we should just let them. We've got enough problems of our own to deal with.
If you mean that literally, security matters have pretty much made unresticted access to the White House doors impossible. But, if you carried an "I Hate Bush" sign to the closest public place to the White House you would not get your "brains bashed."
Not so in business. I got myself through college playing guitar in a red-neck bar and now I'm a CEO of a multinational. An important American myth is the line "pick yourself up, dust yourself off, start all over again." Americans can try new things because risk is encouraged. Failure is not automatically punished like incompetence is. Talent opens doors more than family ties. You (yes, even you) can get a good job in the US --hell, start the whole company-- even if you were born a thousand miles away and you talk with a funny accent. In fact, I'd bet that I could find you a job in the US faster than you could find me a job in the UK.
As Colin Powell said to the euroweenies.......we asked for nothing but a place to bury our dead after we rescued europe.
MEGA BUMP!
"Your nice words sound lovely, but what about reality? If you are all one people why do you make differences except with the initial immigrants? Why are there African-Americans, Italian-Americans, Irish-Americans, yet there are no British-Americans? Why are they just called American? Think about it."
Great summary from ATOMICPUNK:
( )-Americans: Hyphenated Americans are those people who want to be American citizens while still displaying utter contempt for both the country itself and the wholesome, traditional Americans who now comprise the evil white Oppressor class. This dual-status allows the self-defined Victim groups to actually be Americans while simultaneously avoiding the endless abuse reserved for the Unhyphenated Americans who they're free to hate (because of the Hyphen). Dividing Americans conquers America. First come the Ethnic divisions, then the economic divisions, then issues and accusations of injustice and guilt, then the Struggle against Injustice. In just a few steps, Americans are divided up into angry factions which accuse each other of intolerable and unacceptable grievances. In this way America is factionalized, broken into bitter, mutually intolerant groups who attack each other ad infinitum, then require the Liberal Activist Third Way Sociologist Government to referee the very conflicts it's created. Hyphenating Americans is the old "Divide and Conquer" game.
It's worked very well.
John, Blacks from the ghetto have no chance?
May I politely remind you of Colin Powell and condi Rice? There are many more.
Oh, by the way Switzerland was the last western country to allow womwn to vote.
Excellent analysis and that's the true "mindset" behind the civil war and why the south hates Kerry sooooo much. It's a disgrace that he ran for President!
I don't know about that. My personal opinion of America is that our method works. We've risen from nothing to global ascendancy in a scant two centuries, less time than it took to build St. Paul's Cathedral in London. We tamed a continent, fought half a dozen wars -- including one of our own -- and suffered at least one major economic collapse. Yet the simple values espoused by our Constitution still hold, and our people still prosper. Whatever we're doing, we're doing it right.
Does that make us "morally superior?" I don't know that I've ever argued that our superiority is MORAL as much as it is political and economic. The lukewarm socialism practiced by so much of Europe has left that continent spent, decadent, entropic. America seems to be one of few cultures that retains some vitality. To some, especially those who lack it, that may be interpreted as crudity, even boorishness. But to America, it's just energy ... Walt Whitman's "barbaric yawp."
Also, how do you define "old Europe"?
Feudal Europe: Prussia, the Lowlands, Flanders, England, the Holy Roman Empire. Or, in their modern incarnations, Germany, Holland, Belgium, Great Britain, Italy, Spain, and certainly France. Less so the Eastern Bloc, since they are so often regarded as Europe's poorer cousins by their more "enlightened" Western counterparts.
For example, I think the Americans are unknowingly anti-british. Can you think of an American TV show or film were the British guy isn't bad, cold-hearted or a snob? This drives us nuts when the reality is different.
Not sure, but does Austin Powers count?
Actually, I'm not joking about woman's suffage... Look at the way they vote!
I don't worry about slavery much. It has been the default condition of mankind since the dawn of time. I am more amazed at the temporary respite that Western Civ has achieved, at great effort and bloodshed.
With a few exceptions, I don't hate other nations. Just don't have much tolerance for 'em.
Europe has delusions that it's modern day Athens and America is Sparta.
Wouldn't you know the Gipper would have already said it all in a nutshell.
Britain still has that class/royalty/aristocracy hanging around her neck like an albatross. Generations of Britons doff their caps to their so called betters. This is emotionally and societally stultifying. Immigrants to Britain from former colonies still suffer discrimination, too. Maybe they feel as if they're British or in the case of France, French and resent discrimination, but put up with it because that's the way it is -- though in the case of France, Muslims who came from Algeria and Morocco to labor in Marseilles, etc., weren't treated like full fledged French citizens. They were treated with disdain and contempt from day one. They're outbreeding the native French population and will soon carry the vote in national elections. France won't be safe for Christians, Jews, or anyone but Islamofascists. It'll be payback time, and they
have this quaint idea that it's laudable to kill/maim innocents in the furtherance of Jihad.
Nicely put.
I agree wholeheartedly. Individual freedom guarantees you can make a fool of yourself and waste every dime you've got on cultural claptrap, etc., while those who choose not to, don't. It's like living in a box of fireworks that goes off all the time. Bumpity, bumpity, bang, bang, original thought, inventions, thinking outside the box, doing it your way. If you fail, pick yourself up and try again. You can be anything you want to in this life. The only limits are those you place upon yourself. Once ordinary Americans understand this, nothing stops them. This is what drives the rest of the world nuts.
You asked if a black child from the ghetto could achieve the success of a child of Bill Gates. Depends, of course, on what you define as success. Any pro football player in the upcoming Superbowl, black or otherwise, will make more money than most of us can even imagine, etc.. But take our next Secretary of State, Dr. Condi Rice as an example. She grew up in small town south, enduring discrimination...two black girls who died in a church arson fire were childhood friends. Dr. Rice may end up in time as our first woman President. Never mind that she's black.
Uh, Americans decided Germany wasn't our best pal when Schroeder ran for reelection, called GW a 'Nazi', and won. The MSM in Europe is overwhelmingly anti American, not to mention the BBC. And CNN, NBC, etc., for that matter. Secretary of State Powell was lied to by the French and publicly humiliated in the UN in the 'run up' to the Iraq War, not to mention that French fop, de Villepain (sp?)running around the world bribing countries to vote down any meaningful Iraq resolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.