Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramtek57

Big Bump. Keep this alive for tomorrow morning. If not, I'm sure the article will be posted many more times.

Carter needs to be brought up on charges of treason. Everything he does seems to be in opposition to U.S. interests.

For that matter, everything he does seems to be in opposition to the interests of anybody around the world who seeks the freedom we enjoy as U.S. citizens.

When he was President, I always thought he was a good man, but inept and naive.

I have come to believe that nobody can be as inept and naive as he appears to be, so I am starting to conclude that he is a actually corrupt or evil, posing as a good man.

No truly good person would run around the world attempting to prop up evil dictators the way he does.


12 posted on 01/20/2005 12:14:39 AM PST by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bluefish

I agree. Nobody that old and with that much experience can be as naive as Carter pretends to be. He has and continues to be willingly and deliberately engaged in sedition and should be tried for such.


19 posted on 01/20/2005 12:17:18 AM PST by thoughtomator (Meet the new Abbas, same as the old Abbas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish

In re your six paragraphs of comment:

1. This topic is a huge political bombshell and will probably be the Democrat Party's worse nightmare. Maybe the association/participation of a few more high-profile Dems will be revealed.

2., 4. & 5. Carter certainly did present himself as well-meaning. But so sanctimonious, and also a nitpicking micro-manager. Since he chose to associate (cavort?) almost exclusively with Socialists and their causes over at least the last decade, this revelation will reward him with a well deserved comeuppance.

3. Did Ol' Jimmie ever meet a Socialist or learn about a socialist program he didn't like?
I dispute with you about "freedom we enjoy as U.S. citizens." Think IRS. And I urge you to become acquainted with the legal definition of U.S. citizen or alternatively, "citizen of the United States" and the liabilities and jurisdiction individual Americans innocently accept when they voluntarily define themselves as such.

6. Unfortunately, the U.S. government has been cultivating and financing tyrannical regimes since at least WWII. The U.S. financed Saddam Hussein until he attacked Kuwait. Same with Manuel Noriega who's now kept in permanent solitary confinement. Knows too much that would embarrass the U.S. government.


50 posted on 01/20/2005 1:33:41 AM PST by l.tecolote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish
When he was President, I always thought he was a good man, but inept and naive.

I guess giving away the Panama Canal that we bought and paid for didn't impress you.

I guess pulling prop out from under the Shah of Iran and allowing him to be toppled by radical Islam didn't impress you.

I guess the poor condition of our military helicopters during the hostage rescue attempt in Iran didn't impress you.

Jimah Catah is the only president in my lifetime that I had to turn off the TV when he came on, just to protect the TV from being hit by thrown objects. I turned off Clinton for a different reason after he lied to the Grand Jury.

This person is a leftist America hater.

52 posted on 01/20/2005 1:47:32 AM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish
I have come to believe that nobody can be as inept and naive as he appears to be, so I am starting to conclude that he is a actually corrupt or evil, posing as a good man.

Bing! Bing! Bing! We have a winner!!

the infowarrior

59 posted on 01/20/2005 2:35:13 AM PST by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish
When he was President, I always thought he was a good man, but inept and naive.

When I was just s small child and carter was President, I recall being thoroughly convinced he was a weak idiot who had no place in that office. I specifically recall being ashamed of his actions.

62 posted on 01/20/2005 2:38:52 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish

Carter has never recovered from losing his re-election. He simply busied himself setting up a "government in exile." (Interestingly, this is really the way the MSM now views and behaves toward Democrats in general.) I agree that Carter's actions would have been viewed as treasonous in the 19th century. The early governments of this nation would never have tolerated actions such as his (nor Kerry's as a matter of fact).


172 posted on 01/20/2005 7:22:32 AM PST by Another Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish

I don't think he is as naive as he appears. He has a leftist agenda and has from the beginning of his political career. The guy is dangerous, he's a convinced RAT leftist and an embarrassment to the nation. Read the book, "The Real Jimmy Carter" for the true story of this RAT.


188 posted on 01/20/2005 7:36:29 AM PST by Paulus Invictus (RATs are scum! History is their enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bluefish

If no one can bring up Ramsey Clark for treason, how is Carter going to be brought up? The old double standard at work here too.


309 posted on 01/20/2005 7:23:15 PM PST by Atchafalaya (When you're there, thats the best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson