Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No expense spared at inauguration (BBC)
BBC ^ | 19 January, 2005

Posted on 01/19/2005 12:19:30 PM PST by traumer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2005 12:19:33 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traumer
Washington DC police The city of Washington DC has been asked to pay security costs "Precedent suggests that inaugural festivities should be muted - if not cancelled - in wartime," New York Democrat Representative Anthony Weiner said in a letter to President Bush.

How nice - a dem with an appropriate name!
2 posted on 01/19/2005 12:23:16 PM PST by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
"But a Washington Post-ABC News poll found that two-thirds of Americans think inaugural festivities should be scaled back, and that includes half of those who voted for President Bush and 80% of John Kerry's supporters."

A lot of Americans let the media do their thinking.

3 posted on 01/19/2005 12:23:33 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Dear Whining LIberals and Limeys (both the same)

When you stop spending money for the Golden Globes, Oscars, for the Queen's ceremonial guard and palace(s) and for her bloody dumb June birthday celebration, we will reduce the grandeur of our ceremony equally. (with thanks to Rush's show today for that comment).


4 posted on 01/19/2005 12:24:07 PM PST by llevrok (Don't blame me. I voted for Pedro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

And just how much did the Brits drop for the Queen Mum on her 100th birthday bash, hmmmmm?
I say celebrate the hell out of this! Let the Losercrats piss & moan all they like, it will make the day that much sweeter for us!


5 posted on 01/19/2005 12:29:05 PM PST by 95 Bravo ("Freedom is not free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Well at least he did not spend the money buying votes from blackmailers


6 posted on 01/19/2005 12:29:34 PM PST by Ibredd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I don't recall the legacy media ever criticizing the spending on Clinton's inaugural bash. The envy and bitterness from the libs in the press is like nothing I've ever seen. They can't stand the fact Bush will be around another four years. Its a fact of life they're simply going to have to get used to.


7 posted on 01/19/2005 12:29:38 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traumer

"Some have criticised the expense, questioning the propriety of a flashy celebration as US troops are dying in Iraq and South Asia still recovers from last month's deadly tsunami."

Ah, the dreaded and ubiquitous "Some".
Every time I see this usage (and it's frequent) I think it should actually read:

"Some (including those of us at this publiction who don't have the b*lls to say it outloud)...."

Oh, and I stand to be corrected but didn't the first Clinton inauguration go for $40 mil and the second about $35 mil?


8 posted on 01/19/2005 12:31:08 PM PST by jim macomber (Author: "Bargained for Exchange", "Art & Part", "A Grave Breach" http://www.jamesmacomber.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
I was thinking just the same thing.

I did not notice any decrease in the "glamour" at this year's Golden Globe Awards last week-end.

And I just bet that the Academy Awards will be as lavish as ever this year.

9 posted on 01/19/2005 12:31:47 PM PST by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Hey, BBC--how much of Britians PUBLIC money is spent on keeping a well heeled, impotent monarchy in place every year? I believe much of President Bush's party is being done with private funding.


10 posted on 01/19/2005 12:32:42 PM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Geesh, give us a break. President Bush's first inaugural was not the usual high function, because we only had THREE WEEKS to prepare for it. This time we are well planned and ready to celebrate. Celebrate good times, alright! The dull dims can go sulk somewhere else.


11 posted on 01/19/2005 12:33:57 PM PST by raisincane (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfield - A Great US Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Who paid for dumb Prince Harry's shirt?


12 posted on 01/19/2005 12:35:15 PM PST by Beckwith (John Kerry has now met with the enemy during war two times, in 1970 and again in 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I think the former president and his gang ought to pay back taxpayers for his trips to China and Africa with donors. They used 72 million of our money as I understand it. The list of Democrats was very long for China and it numbered about 1200. Africa was cheaper because only 900 Democrats went along. I understand they pulled military aircraft from Korea to carry the elitists baggage. When the media starts complaining and moaning about the party in Washington paid for by citizens, remind them about the Democrats being treated to trips on tax money. I would like the Clinton Democrats to pay that all back.


13 posted on 01/19/2005 12:35:29 PM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traumer
How is money 'wasted?' How many people in the hotel, service and amenities industries will make a good night's wages and tips because of these 'wastes' of money? Every penny spent on any of it will end up buying someone's services or products and get more economic activity underway. It's not like they're raking this money into a bonfire!

To use tsunami survivors as a cover to pour water on a celebration of George Bush being re-elected is utter bilge.

14 posted on 01/19/2005 12:37:18 PM PST by atomicpossum (I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The money is not going to Bush, or even to his benefit. It's being used to entertain the people who are giving the money. It's their money. They can spend it however they want.

I might suggest that for consistency, Hollywood should cancel the various awards ceremonies they sponsor and give the money to the troops. Why should anyone spend money on parties as long as there are American troops in Iraq?


15 posted on 01/19/2005 12:37:53 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Naff-off you bloody limeys!


16 posted on 01/19/2005 12:38:02 PM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Scrape 'em off! They wouldn't be satisfied no matter what Pres. Bush did or didn't do so who cares? They're all a bunch of pissy whiney jerks that don't warrant consideration. Viva La Bush!


17 posted on 01/19/2005 12:40:09 PM PST by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: traumer
How about the friggin' Jubilee? ...
18 posted on 01/19/2005 12:40:46 PM PST by maggief (Go Kerry-Boxer, Team Botox '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Hey BBC, stick to your brown-shirt royalty.


19 posted on 01/19/2005 12:41:06 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo ("When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Heard a couple of days ago that this $40 million is from private donations not public monies. Also, clintoon spent $33 million on his inauguration. So what's the big deal?


20 posted on 01/19/2005 12:41:40 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson