Posted on 01/19/2005 10:31:09 AM PST by Indy Pendance
As King, you should prevent such things.
Isn't this SOP for an inauguration. No offense, but for a lot of homeless,there is a reason for it, and it centers around personal responsibility.
We have considered implementing the soylent-green option.
Ah yes, that was implimented long ago south of me in Mexico.
It really is pathetic how little originality the MSM is exhibiting. They are going back to the well and it is dry. Yes, Bush is responsible for homelessness, yes, Bush lied about (fill in the blank), yes, Bush wants to rob grandma's social security check, yes, Bush wants to drag young black men behind vehicles, yes, this has been a recording of the MSM brought to you by years and years of the same shyt.
Silly you! Don't you know the homeless only come out during Republican administrations?
Theu ought to stop paying bobble heads like Couric and Olbermann and just replay old tapes while dubbing in new dates.
Breaking News! Drinking cheap wine and smoking crack makes you invisible. In a related discovery, PCP was found to make you invulnerable, and LSD was found to make you capable of flight.
Are you refering to the "trailer to the 21st Century?"
Could it be because there is a SNOW STORM in DC? If they weren't brought indoors, it would be Bush's fault for being a heartless SOB and letting them freeze. Reuters is pathetic.
Visiting liberals walking hand and hand with the homeless.
Offering them warm blankets, hot food, clean clothes, shelter, medicine, ........
Oh wait, sorry, I was thinking about tsunami victims,,
Never mind.
I think (everything was everything) during klintoon's inaugurations. The msm had to cover for their commie rapist poster boy. NSNR
When FDR was president he had a saying, a chicken in every pot. Klintoon's was, a B'atch under every democrats desk. NSNR
"This is ridiculous. To hear them tell it, homelessness started with Bush!"
Well, duh, it *IS* Bush's fault...after all, he has a home and they don't! /sarcasm
It seems as if they have no initiative to pull themselves by their bootstraps. Oh heck! I forgot it's President Bush's fault not their's. NSNR
Stupidest article I've ever read. Kerry write it?
Homeless people? I don't see any homeless people.
/sarcasm
Please, they prefer to be called Urban Outdoorsman....or Structurally Challenged.
Did a Google search for clinton inauguration homeless.
One article by David Hackworth mentioned Clinton was spending 37 million for his inaugruation but Hackworth wants it spent on vets:
http://www.hackworth.com/5feb97.html
Try to follow this. I'm going to clean out the kitchen cabinets.
Full article:
http://secure.mediaresearch.org/news/mediawatch/1996/mw19960201stud.html
.....snip........So now that Bill Clinton has been in office for three years, has the ever-growing problem of homelessness continued to burden the White House? Or did the problem recede from the media's agenda? MediaWatch analysts used the MRC Media Tracking System to count the number of network evening news segments on homelessness in America on the four evening newscasts (ABC's World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, and CNN's Prime News or World News). Analysts found the problem faded from the list of priorities. In the Bush years (1989-1992), the number of homeless stories per year averaged 52.5, but in the first three years of the Clinton administration, the average dropped to 25.3 stories a year.
During the Bush administration, the story count grew from 44 in 1989 to a peak of 71 in 1990, followed by 54 stories in 1991 and 43 in 1992. By contrast, stories on America's homeless dipped slightly to 35 stories in 1993, and 32 in 1994. In 1995, the number fell dramatically to just nine. When the count is broken down by network, CNN had the widest gap in reporting during the Bush years and Clinton years (90-30), closely followed by ABC (45-16), CBS (41-15), and NBC (36-15).
But the numbers alone do not tell the whole story. The decline in homeless coverage coincided with the lessening of unsupported statistics about the size of the homeless population. CNN anchor Lou Waters announced on August 8, 1989: "A new research report is warning that homelessness in this country could easily double or triple if there is a mild recession...there now are up to 40 million Americans living on the knife edge of homelessness, just one paycheck, one domestic argument from the streets."
The willingness to wildly extrapolate the number of America's homeless began to change slightly in 1991, when the Census Bureau's partial count of the homeless in shelters and on the street reported an estimate of 220,000 homeless Americans. All four networks reported on the Census count the night it occurred (March 20, 1990). But when the Census Bureau released its official report announcing a count of 220,000 on April 12, 1991, only CNN reported it. ABC referred to the estimate on May 9, but only to note that congressional sources claimed the estimate was "meaningless."
While the stories in the Bush era regularly blamed Republican administrations, not one of the 75 homeless stories in the last three years has placed any blame on the Clinton administration. On January 21, 1993, ABC featured a report on the gaudiness of the Clinton inauguration, which reporter Judy Muller concluded: "The Republicans were criticized for their show of wealth in the face of need. The Democrats seemed to have avoided such criticism. Perhaps because President Clinton has promised to help those less fortunate. For now, not many people seem to begrudge Bill Clinton his night on the town, considering the sobering realities he faces the morning after." ..........
Better yet, they actually should make bobble heads of Couric and Olberman, put them on camera, and then dub in the old stories.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.