The headline suggests this article is about an incident at an event where Kid Rock was not even present, so why is 90% of the text devoted to Kid Rock?
That's exactly what I was thinking.
The story was the quickly apologized Fuel comment, and that's it. I abhor the degradation of the language and feel that the "f-bomb" is all-too-common, but this is just a padded one-graf blurb.
"The headline suggests this article is about an incident at an event where Kid Rock was not even present, so why is 90% of the text devoted to Kid Rock?"
The writer is obsessed with Kid Rock and can't get him out of his mind. Pathetic really.....
The author didn't want all of that research to go to waste?