1.)How is providing quotes, that are hidden within academic journals and rarely ever make it to light, which are from evolutionists that undermine evolution deceitful?
No doubt it wouldn't be deceitful in your universe if you thought these quotes supported evolution.
2.)Willful deceit? The reason it is deceit to you is no doubt that the quotes from evolutionists run counter to evolution. If they supported it, you most likely would not be saying what you are. That is apparent.
What I see from you and others is an attempt to brand quotes from evolutionits that run counter to evolution as deceitful. That is low. Most likely if these quotes supported evolution you(and others on here)would be giving them high praise right now.
3.) Not quite as impressive as what I see from you. Really impressive stuff, ALS squared.
Because the quotes in question were taken completely out of context in a wilfully deceptive manner. Which has been demonstrated many times in this thread BY SEVERAL PEOPLE THAT FULLY QUOTED WHAT YOU MINED. Much like your assertion that there are "many" scientists that don't believe in Evolution. It's just BS.
The reason it is deceit to you is no doubt that the quotes from evolutionists run counter to evolution
Evolutionists.....countering evolution? Are you serious?