Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Living' robots powered by muscle
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4181197.stm ^ | Roland Pease

Posted on 01/17/2005 4:12:36 PM PST by Mike Fieschko

The micro-device, image courtesy of Nature and the University of California
The robot is a dramatic example of the marriage of biotechnology with nanotechnology

Tiny robots powered by living muscle have been created by scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles.

The devices were formed by "growing" rat cells on microscopic silicon chips, the researchers report in the journal Nature Materials.

Less than a millimetre long, the miniscule robots can move themselves without any external source of power.

The work is a dramatic example of the marriage of biotechnology with the tiny world of nanotechnology.

In nanotechnology, researchers often turn to the natural world for inspiration.

But Professor Carlo Montemagno, of the University of California, Los Angeles, turns to nature not for ideas, but for actual starting materials.

In the past he has made rotary nano-motors out of genetically engineered proteins. Now he has grown muscle tissue onto tiny robotic skeletons.

Living device

Montemano's team used rat heart cells to create a tiny device that moves on its own when the cells contract. A second device looks like a minute pair of frog legs.

"The bones that we're using are either a plastic or they're silicon based," he said. "So we make these really fine structures that mechanically have hinges that allow them to move and bend.

"And then by nano-scale manipulation of the surface chemistry, the muscle cells get the cues to say, 'Oh! I want to attach at this point and not to attach at another point'. And so the cells assemble, then they undergo a change, so that they actually form a muscle.

"Now you have a device that has a skeleton and muscles on it to allow it to move."

Under a microscope, you can see the tiny, two-footed "bio-bots" crawl around.

Professor Montemagno says muscles like these could be used in a host of microscopic devices - even to drive miniature electrical generators to power computer chips.

But when biological cells become attached to silicon - are they alive?

"They're absolutely alive," Professor Montemagno told BBC News. "I mean the cells actually grow, multiply and assemble - they form the structure themselves. So the device is alive."

The notion is likely to disturb many who already have concerns about nanotechnology.

But for Carlo Montemagno, a professor of engineering, it makes sense to match the solutions that nature has already found through billions of years of evolution to the newest challenges in technology.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biotech; nanotechnology; science

1 posted on 01/17/2005 4:12:36 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Less than a millimetre long, the miniscule robots can move themselves without any external source of power.

Not sure how they have suspended the second law of thermodynamics. But maybe rats are special.

2 posted on 01/17/2005 4:15:50 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I don't have a problem attaching rat muscles to a machine. There's no sanctity of life issues there.

However, the promise of nanotechnology is often centered on medical applications. The idea of rat muscles crawling around inside my body to remove a cancer tumour is not very appealing. On the other hand, if I had cancer, and there was little alternative, bring on those rat muscles!!!


3 posted on 01/17/2005 4:17:40 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

If they need more Rat cells. They can have all the rats in my neighborhood, but the have to take the bodies with them. Also any Dems they find!


4 posted on 01/17/2005 4:18:26 PM PST by handy old one (Never confuse the facts with the issues!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

This is to nanotechnology what the first chain reaction was to nuclear engineering.


5 posted on 01/17/2005 4:19:43 PM PST by NetValue (I would kiss a cobra before I'd trust a democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

6 posted on 01/17/2005 4:59:15 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Rat cells? I'm waiting for the PETA rebuttal before I conclude there are no moral issues here. :)


7 posted on 01/17/2005 6:24:03 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
I thought that for muscles to work they had to have a blood supply for oxygen and nutrients. How did they solve that?
8 posted on 01/17/2005 7:10:12 PM PST by Boiling point (If God had not meant for man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boiling point
I thought that for muscles to work they had to have a blood supply for oxygen and nutrients. How did they solve that?

Id like to know as well.
9 posted on 01/17/2005 7:53:20 PM PST by Mike Fieschko (Stop or I shall be forced to say stop again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"I'm waiting for the PETA rebuttal before I conclude there are no moral issues here. :)"

PETA always has issues. THey won't be happy until the rats take over. (Double Entendre intended)

10 posted on 01/18/2005 7:31:58 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson