Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Create "Great Gated Community"
Counterjab ^ | 01/16/2004 | Chris Davis

Posted on 01/16/2005 5:15:19 PM PST by writer33

In a bold new plan, rumors surfaced, that Bush is planning to create a “Great Gated Community” across the Mexican and Canadian borders. Through an unnamed email and at CBS, Counterjab learned Bush had resolved to take major strides in immigration reform. Rather than proceed with stricter immigration enforcement, Bush has instead, decided to seal up everything, keeping us safe from terrorists.

“This is utterly ridiculous. There’s no way we could get this proposal past the House of Representatives,” said an unnamed source at the White House. “This is a complete red herring. In fact, this email is highly questionable. We’re going to get to the bottom of this.”

Unfortunately, that isn’t the end of it.

Counterjab has also been informed of the recent release of memos and telephone transcripts, detailing the “Gated Community” plan. Speaking with a former unnamed producer at CBS, we were able to nail Bush to the wall. “We’ve got him on the run,” said the former unnamed producer. “This will cost the taxpayers a fortune. It’s only a matter of time before impeachment proceedings begin.”

The plan calls for a total construction of a great wall, resembling the Great Wall of China. According to the unsubstantiated memos and transcripts, the cost to the project totals a whopping 500 trillion dollars. That would reportedly require the immediate repeal of all tax cuts, with an additional tripling of tax increases to pay for the project. The idea comes in the wake of the failure in Iraq. The wall is said to be constructed of concrete, reinforced with rebar and splashed with brick veneer, giving it that ever so subtle hint of style.

“It’s a masterpiece,” said an unnamed former first lady. “I’d have it constructed at my home. I think the plan is brilliant.”

“If you can’t win the war, then we’ll just hunker down, build a wall and take a trip back to the nineties. After all, we were better off then anyway. With this economy, you’d be a fool not to," said a former unnamed great president, through unsubstantiated phone transcripts.

A statement released shortly afterwards by the White House, says that the plan is “appalling.” “This would require the immediate withdraw of all troops in Iraq to protect the borders during the building phase. We have no intention of doing that. We don’t know where these kinds of things surface. We have learned it came from somewhere in Texas.”

The troubling rumors, memos and phone transcripts suggest that the building phase begins in Arizona. Counterjab dug deeper with the unnamed former producer. “I don’t why they’re starting there instead of California. But quite frankly, you can’t blame them. No one wants to bother with California anymore.” She…I mean the unnamed producer giggled. “Even the Governator can’t save it.”

Counterjab also spoke with an unnamed Canadian Prime Minister. “I think this is a wonderful plan. Why bother with fighting the war on terror? Just build a wall. Of course we’ll have to talk with Bush. I hope this doesn’t affect outsourcing.”

“All indications are that outsourcing will continue. It will just leave America sealed up. Much like a bottle of 1996 Chateau Mouton-Rothschild wine, a most appropriate year,” said the unnamed Canadian Prime Minister.

We are pleased to bring this report to you, using the most informative and accurate information. Even though the email, memos and phone transcripts are unsubstantiated, we are going to regard them as accurate. We will, however, keep an open mind when reporting further on this story. We think it deserves all of our attention in the future.

In the opinion of Counterjab, it’s high time that Bush sobered up and acted responsibly in protecting the American people. After all, we shouldn’t be bothering with immigration reform when a wall will suffice. With the building of this wall, it’s only a matter of time before we have the recall of troops throughout the world.

“We’ll keep on top of that report, or we won’t call ourselves journalists,” said the Managing Editor at Counterjab. “I think this is a wonderful way to reach out to liberals…become non partisan as it were.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: aliens; doit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Red Sea Swimmer

That oughta do it.


61 posted on 01/16/2005 6:32:13 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lodwick

:)


62 posted on 01/16/2005 6:32:46 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

I'm sure we could find 'em.


63 posted on 01/16/2005 6:33:27 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
"...anyone that helps Hillary get elected deserves what's coming to them. Not only will she accept every illegal in the country she will force you to pay to feed, cloth and educate them."

Watch the HildaBeast try to set herself up to the Right of the GOP on Immigration Reform over the next coupla years...it's a typical Clintonian Triangulation strategy.

FReegards...MUD

64 posted on 01/16/2005 6:33:51 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Have you ever read my serious stuff? If so, you wouldn't be making these comments.


65 posted on 01/16/2005 6:36:01 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim

I can't wait for the witch to put something in writing. The latin gangs will put out contracts on her.


66 posted on 01/16/2005 6:37:36 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: writer33

I'm kinda pro immigration, the more we take in the lower the tax hikes will be in the future. Time to face facts.


67 posted on 01/16/2005 6:38:57 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Immigration if fine. Just not illegal immigration amnesty.


68 posted on 01/16/2005 6:42:04 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Well, you can always vote for Hillary.


69 posted on 01/16/2005 6:42:51 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Hillary won't be running.


70 posted on 01/16/2005 6:44:05 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: writer33

And the pope doesn't have a rosary.


71 posted on 01/16/2005 6:44:46 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

"I'm kinda pro immigration, the more we take in the lower the tax hikes will be in the future. Time to face facts."

Fine , we can have them attend your neighbohhod schools in the meantime and don't pay attention to the graffiti by the MS-13 gang, terrorists can't read that trash anyhow.


72 posted on 01/16/2005 6:46:21 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
"I'm kinda pro immigration..."

Being pro-immigration--which I am--is not mutually-exclusive with being ANTI-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!

FReegards...MUD

73 posted on 01/16/2005 6:47:07 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Remember I told you that when it doesn't happen. Four years is a long, hard road for a liberal.


74 posted on 01/16/2005 6:47:37 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: writer33

BTTT


75 posted on 01/16/2005 6:48:13 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

They already do, they make great housekeepers and they'll mow your lawn real cheap.


76 posted on 01/16/2005 6:48:27 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Now I know not to take your articles serious.


77 posted on 01/16/2005 6:50:08 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: facedown

Thanks for the bump.


78 posted on 01/16/2005 6:51:11 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

You shouldn't have taken this one seriously. It doesn't mean it was funny. There's a difference between humor and funny. This is humor, using absurdity to illustrate liberal policies.

And just remember I told you so. I think I'll log you down so I can come back and gloat. :)


79 posted on 01/16/2005 6:52:39 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: writer33
You shouldn't have taken this one seriously.

I never did. Are you the Al Franken of FR ?
80 posted on 01/16/2005 6:55:12 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson