Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The irregularities and changes in this election just keep coming.
1 posted on 01/16/2005 7:49:32 AM PST by Seattle Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Seattle Conservative

If the people of WA do not rise up and re-take their govt from the Dems then they will seserve what they get.


2 posted on 01/16/2005 7:51:47 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative; All
Crosslinked:
 Rossi v. Gregoire: How Elections Are Stolen
 

3 posted on 01/16/2005 7:58:21 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative

Rossi was on Hannity and Colmes a few days ago and the liberals on there were telling him to be gracious like Al Gore and congratulate his opponent! And they said that unlike Gore, Rossi at least got a full re-count! I sure hope this is not as hopeless as it appears. Who will support a challenge of this election's vote totals in such a liberal state?


5 posted on 01/16/2005 8:39:45 AM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative

This is disgraceful! At least, a Congressional investigation will be able to throw the words of the filthy dems in Congress back at them during this search for fraud. The only positive about the whole thing is Ohio. The black thugs in Michigan and Ohio KNOW they paid for the same kind of fraud in Ohio and it DIDN'T work and they still don't know why. I do! The union officials and black precinct workers stuck the cash intheir own pockets and didn't pay voters to vote ALL those fake registrations. The beauty is that dems did to dems what the dems try to do to us all!


9 posted on 01/16/2005 8:56:32 AM PST by Tacis (Democrats! - When You Need America Blamed Or A Pool Peed In!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative
In the Dec. 29 version of the list, there are 70 voters who registered between 10/3 and 10/18. 4 are recorded as voting absentee, 66 are recorded as provisional. There are 35 voters recorded as having registered after 10/18, all of whom are recorded as voting provisional on Nov. 2.

According to the election rules, if the Dec. 29 list (the first version) is correct, those 66 + 35 votes should have been disallowed. King County needs to say whether they were allowed or not. King County also needs to explain why the list was changed between Dec. 29 and Jan. 7.

Was the list revised after the 2nd count, yet before the 3rd count? If so, that's a smoking gun of at least some of the illegality. Anybody know when the 3rd recount began?

11 posted on 01/16/2005 9:21:30 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative

If you are keeping a ping list -- please put me on it. I want to follow this story because I used to live in Snohomish.


13 posted on 01/16/2005 5:05:48 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seattle Conservative

If you are keeping a ping list -- please put me on it. I want to follow this story because I used to live in Snohomish.


14 posted on 01/16/2005 5:06:29 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson