[Joe Hadenuf]

Something that you can now say as a matter of hindsight considering the fact that you would have never been able to say it had we not invaded the place and settled the WMD question once and for all.

Oh horse dung.

You may fool some of these folks louie, with your neoRepublican crap, but not Joe.

If Saddam had WMDs why in hell didn't he use them on us when we clean his clock, slaughtering thousands of his Republican Guard when we kicked his ass out of Kuwait? Remember the Road of Death, the route from Kuwait to the Iraqi port of Basra along which Saddam Hussein's army retreated during the Gulf war in the early 90s?

It was inordinately clear, this AH couldn't have fought his way out of a paper bag.

No answer Joey?

I noted you just skipped over the obvious, and glaring.

No answer louie?

I must say, after repeatedly cleaning they floor with you, you never fail to give it a nice shine.

[Republican Wildcat]

You may fool some of these folks louie, with your neoRepublican crap, but not Joe.

Yes, just making stuff up as you go along and having selective memory loss at just the right moment is just brilliant, Joe. Showing up and spouting off personal insults at random to people who aren't even talking to you on threads and not even discussing the same subject matter as you insulted them over is also an amazing and effective way of demonstrating your superiority. Who can stand up to such superior intellect?

[FreeReign]

You may fool some of these folks louie, with your neoRepublican crap, but not Joe.

Joe, both isolationist Republicans and global Republicans have been around for a long time. It's nothing new. NeoRepublicans and the war in Iraq, blah, blah blah. NeoConservatives and the war in Iraq...blah, blah blah. It's all a bunch of neoBS brought to you by the liberal media.

You absorb it like a milksop.

[Luis Gonzalez]

The entire world took it for granted that Hussein had WMDs, otherwise the whole world wouldn't have been demanding that he get rid of them, the fact that he did not use them in 1991 in no way means that he did not have them in 2002...and that's your entire reasoning, that since he apparently didn't have them in 1991 (he did), he didn't have them now.

Well Joe...the question seems to have been settled, and now, we no longer had to concern ourselves with Saddam Hussein, and the possibility of his selling weapons to terrorists to use against us.

So, where exactly is the downside Joe?