Replies

The entire world took it for granted that Hussein had WMDs, otherwise the whole world wouldn't have been demanding that he get rid of them, the fact that he did not use them in 1991 in no way means that he did not have them in 2002...and that's your entire reasoning, that since he apparently didn't have them in 1991 (he did), he didn't have them now.

Well Joe...the question seems to have been settled, and now, we no longer had to concern ourselves with Saddam Hussein, and the possibility of his selling weapons to terrorists to use against us.

So, where exactly is the downside Joe?

the fact that he did not use them in 1991 in no way means that he did not have them in 2002

Uh, lets see here. He didn't use them in the early 90s when his butt was kicked out of Kuwait, as we slaughtered thousands of his Republican guard as they were fleeing back into Iraq. So many died they named it the "Road of death". And again, just *recently*, he didn't use them when we invaded his *entire* country.

I don't think one needs to be a senior investigator to understand that if he had these big bad weapons of mass destruction, and his *entire* damn country was being invaded, with *him* being a prime target, one would think he would use them. Eh louie?

I don't know louie, it's just a wild guess.

I must say though, compared to Saddam, I've seen tougher, meaner, transients, drunks and bums. When they pulled Saddam out of his hole, he looked like some petty, weak begger.