1 posted on
01/14/2005 3:32:57 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: kattracks
well liberal atheists offend ME so we're even.
55 posted on
01/14/2005 5:30:22 PM PST by
Awestruck
(The artist formerly known as Goodie D)
To: kattracks
Reagan once said that he didn't see how anyone could be President without having been an actor first. He was kidding, obviously, but I see this as similar. Bush was merely giving his opinion, based upon his experience in office.
59 posted on
01/14/2005 5:53:28 PM PST by
Nea Wood
(I considered atheism but there weren't enough holidays.)
To: kattracks
I am offended that they are offended.
61 posted on
01/14/2005 6:02:44 PM PST by
navygal
To: kattracks
Those who disdain the Lord God invariably have a replacement: materialism; a secular figure such as Marx; themselves.
63 posted on
01/14/2005 6:16:52 PM PST by
mtntop3
("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
To: kattracks
Bush's comments were "divisive," they say, and an insult to those who don't believe in religious creeds or a deity.
The last I checked, any president is still a US citizen with the right of free speech.
If all the atheists in the country want to use it as a reason for not voting for the President...fine. Odds are all 2000 of them weren't voting for him anyway. Atheists tend toward socialism.
65 posted on
01/14/2005 6:24:21 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: kattracks
An atheist group is criticizing President Bush for saying he can't see how one can be president without a relationship with the Lord. Bush's comments were "divisive," they say, and an insult to those who don't believe in religious creeds or a deity.
Screw em. Their position is intellectually indefensible anyway.
66 posted on
01/14/2005 6:26:02 PM PST by
aruanan
To: kattracks
I'm an atheist, and I'm not offended at all. I believe that he is sincere, and I admire that.
OTOH, if that P-O-S Clinton said something like that, I would be VERY offended, since there's no way in h%ll he could possibly mean it.
72 posted on
01/14/2005 6:43:05 PM PST by
cooldog
(Islam is a criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder ... deal with it!)
To: kattracks
An "offended athiest" is a good thing.
Kind of like a light in a burglar's eyes.
73 posted on
01/14/2005 6:43:54 PM PST by
G Larry
(Admiral James Woolsey as National Intelligence Director)
To: kattracks
What percentage of the population are athiests? Are we talking about a tiny splinter group here? Answer: Yes! What percentage of athiests voted for Kerry? Should President Bush be concerned and apologize. I think not. Today the Supremes knocked out one athiest with an attitude, so the Prez can say whatever he wants. Someone, usually a leftist, is always going to find something he says offensive. They beg to be ignored.
To: kattracks
INTREP - In a word, "tough" - Survive
79 posted on
01/14/2005 9:25:58 PM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Secularization of America is happening)
To: kattracks
And just how can't an atheist take these comments offensively being antipodal to Bush's faith?
81 posted on
01/14/2005 10:44:46 PM PST by
Puckster
To: kattracks
If these people do not believe in GOD, Why does he scare them so much?
To: kattracks
"President Bush goes far beyond keeping his faith to himself. He's trying to turn our government into a 'religion bully' where the state enforces religious belief and religious correctness. That's un-American," he concluded. What is this guy talking about? He has obviously never lived in a country where the government bullies its citizens. Our government is not being turned into a "bully" that enforces religious belief and correctness. This is simply not happening. Leaving "under God" in the pledge of allegiance is not enforcement of religious belief. Those words have been in the pledge for fifty years and nobody complained until a few years ago.
Finally I have to say that Ellen Johnson does not know much about our constitution when she says we have a "constitutional commitment to separation of government and religion." There is no such commitment in our constitution to the kind of extreme and total separation of government and religion that these atheists and the ACLU advocate. It's just mind-boggling the way the ACLU wants to remove all references to religion from all government property in America. They remind me of the Stalin regime in the old Soviet Union that tried to remove all religion from the Soviet state. The ACLU has lost its collective mind, leading to their outrageously extreme efforts to remove a cross from the LA county seal and to remove a religious plaque from Grand Canyon National Park that was a gift from a group of nuns.
85 posted on
01/15/2005 6:20:06 AM PST by
carl in alaska
(Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Kerry is a liar and rotten to the core)
To: kattracks
The whine and complaint of the godless is music to my ears.
86 posted on
01/15/2005 6:22:48 AM PST by
mgc1122
To: kattracks
Hello atheists--GET OVER IT.
You want an atheist country--Go to Russia. Better, Cuba. Even better, North Korea. Help yourself. Soonest, please.
88 posted on
01/15/2005 6:31:19 AM PST by
Quix
(HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
To: kattracks
I'd tell them to go to h*l, but I guess they don't believe in that either!
91 posted on
01/15/2005 6:45:24 AM PST by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: kattracks
93 posted on
01/15/2005 6:45:50 AM PST by
The Wizard
(DemonRATS: enemies of America)
To: kattracks
Bush's Remarks on Religion Offends Atheists - Good!
To: kattracks
Atheists offend me. Big deal.
To: kattracks
98 posted on
01/15/2005 6:59:16 AM PST by
tob2
(Old Fossil and Proud of It!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson