[MississippiMan]

If some homosexuals disrupted a service at a church -- as has happened, although I can't recall one in Philly -- I don't think any judge would threaten them with a 45-year sentence...

I agree with what you're saying, but do know that you're comparing apples and oranges. Repent America was on a PUBLIC street and they had every right to be there. A church is by nature PRIVATE property. Even so, you're right: Homos could stand up in a church and scream or probably even get naked and start fondling each other, and they still wouldn't face felony charges.

The author of this article obviously has some sort of agenda or else is too dim to grasp the real issue here, which is: What gave the police the authority to declare that one group can walk on this public street while another cannot?

MM

[Tribune7]

Repent America was on a PUBLIC street and they had every right to be there.

Government has an obligation to keep order. If there is a disturbance and a cop tells you to move you have to move. If you refuse the cop is empowered to arrest you.

[TAdams8591]

"The author of this article obviously has some sort of agenda or else is too dim to grasp the real issue here,"

He's dim and his reasoning is frequently immature and juvenile. But he has an incredible EGO!