Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Trail to Follow (Oil For Food Scandal)
Wall Street Journal ^ | January 12, 2005 | CLAUDIA ROSETT

Posted on 01/13/2005 10:47:29 PM PST by XHogPilot

Did Saddam Hussein loot a fund to compensate victims of the 1990 invasion?

snip) Paul Volcker's U.N.-approved inquiry finally released the program's 55 secret internal audits, which Congress and others had been requesting for months.

(snip)

Now, with the release of the U.N.'s previously secret internal audits, we learn that there was considerable concern within the Secretariat's auditing department over some aspects of UNCC performance--(snip), may have resulted in overpayments of perhaps as much as $4 billion.

For example, the auditors objected that in paying out claims at old (snip)exchange rates, the UNCC overpaid by $2.2 billion. Or there's the notation on a March 6, 2002, audit report that a UNCC payment of $58.9 million for a refugee camp in Jordan had overstated the camp's population by a factor of three, and "the UNCC was unable to provide an adequate explanation for the difference."

This was hardly the picture conveyed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan in the little the public glimpsed of the internal audits, via reports he forwarded to the U.N. General Assembly. In a public report dated April 4, 2002, Mr. Annan vaguely mentioned (snip) a reference to $486,130, which he said the auditors had questioned and the UNCC had nonetheless decided was "appropriate."

(snip)

The rotating panels of commissioners who awarded the (UNCC)$18.8 billion were chosen via in-house evaluation of their credentials by the U.N. Secretariat, nominated by the UNCC and approved by Mr. Annan; but little detail about them or their decisions was disclosed to the public. The records made publicly available by the UNCC do not in some cases disclose who the end-recipients were. Some of the funds were channeled to end-users via governments, including those of such terrorist-sponsoring states as Syria and Iran, as well as Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: annan; iraq; kofiannan; oilforfood; saddamhussein; un; uncc; uncorruption
Definitely worth reading the entire article. My (snipping) to avoid auto excerpt has degraded an excellent article detailing the fraud of the UN and SecGen Kofi Annan.
1 posted on 01/13/2005 10:47:29 PM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

BTT


2 posted on 01/13/2005 10:50:14 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

"But given that Saddam's illicit gains may be funding murder today, especially in such vital theaters as Iraq; and given the dark seams that ran through Oil for Food--of dirty money, secret arms deals and links to terrorist networks--the United Nations Compensation Commission seems a good place for investigators to log some serious time, and soon."

BUMP


3 posted on 01/13/2005 10:53:45 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot; All
Crosslinked:

Click this picture & go to the "last" for the latest UN scandals:


4 posted on 01/13/2005 11:38:50 PM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Now that's just stupid and, sorry, beyond logic. If The UN compensations program overcharged Iraq (or "Saddam" as Mrs. Rosett prefers to say) for damages done in Gulf War I, then it's Iraq/Saddam that was "looted" by the international comunity and war profiteers in neighboring countries - NOT the other way round. Capiche?


5 posted on 01/14/2005 5:41:36 AM PST by vincenzzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vincenzzo

It's capische. The compensations progrram was paying way too much to certain 'clients' in the ME. Why? Who was getting itY Were there kickbacks to UN personnel? Capische?


6 posted on 01/14/2005 6:50:10 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
I can name a few of those who got money as compensation for "lost profits" from Iraq:

Texaco $505m
Halliburton $18m
Sheraton $11m
Bechtel $7m
Pepsi $3.8m
Nestlé $2.6m
Mobil $2.3m
Shell $1.6m
Philip Morris $1.3m
Kentucky Fried Chicken $321,000
Toys R Us $189,449

Now that's the real scandal - that Iraq is STILL paying for outrageous claims. Not some wacky theory that Iraq was secretly suing itself to pocket its own money.




Category "E" Claims

Category "E" claims are claims of corporations, other private legal entities and public sector enterprises. They include claims for: construction or other contract losses; losses from the non-payment for goods or services; losses relating to the destruction or seizure of business assets; loss of profits; and oil sector losses. The Commission received approximately 5,800 category "E" claims submitted by seventy Governments seeking a total of approximately US$80 billion in compensation. The category "E" claims range from asserted losses of a few thousand US dollars to those for several billion US dollars. The Commission has established four subcategories of category "E" claims.



Category "F" Claims

Category "F" claims are claims filed by Governments and international organizations for losses incurred in evacuating citizens; providing relief to citizens; damage to diplomatic premises and loss of, and damage to, other government property; and damage to the environment. The Commission has received approximately 300 category "F" claims, submitted by forty-three Governments and six international organisations, seeking a total of approximately US$210 billion in compensation. The category "F" claims have been organised into four subcategories. In addition, the "E/F" category covers export guarantee and insurance claims.



Category "A" Claims

Category "A" claims are claims submitted by individuals who had to depart from Kuwait or Iraq between the date of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait on 2 August 1990 and the date of the cease-fire, 2 March 1991. Compensation for successful claims in this category was set by the Governing Council at the fixed sum of US$2,500 for individual claimants and US$5,000 for families. However, where a claimant who had filed claims in category "A" only, he or she was eligible to receive a maximum category "A" payment of US$4,000 for individuals and US$8,000 for families. The Commission received approximately 920,000 category "A" claims submitted by seventy-seven Governments and thirteen offices of three international organizations, seeking a total of approximately US$3.6 billion in compensation.



Category "B" Claims

Category "B" claims are claims submitted by individuals who suffered serious personal injury or whose spouse, child or parent died as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait. Compensation for successful claims in this category was set at US$2,500 for individuals and up to US$10,000 for families. The Commission received approximately 6,000 category "B" claims submitted by forty-seven Governments and seven offices of three international organisations, seeking a total of approximately US$21 million in compensation.



Category "C" Claims

Category "C" claims are individual claims for damages up to US$100,000 each. Category "C" claims can be made for twenty-one different types of losses, including those relating to departure from Kuwait or Iraq; personal injury; mental pain and anguish; loss of personal property; loss of bank accounts, stocks and other securities; loss of income; loss of real property; and individual business losses. The Commission received approximately 420,000 category "C" claims submitted by eighty-five Governments and eight offices of three international organisations, seeking a total of approximately US$9 billion in compensation. In addition, the Central Bank of the Government of Egypt submitted a consolidated category "C" claim on behalf of over 800,000 workers in Iraq for the non-transfer of remittances by Iraqi banks to beneficiaries in Egypt. This consolidated Egyptian category "C" claim comprised 1,240,000 individual claims with an asserted value of approximately US$491 million.



Category "D" Claims

Category "D" claims are individual claims for damages above US$100,000 each. The types of losses that can be claimed under category "D" are similar to those under category "C", with the most frequent being the loss of personal property; the loss of real property; the loss of income and business-related losses. The Commission received approximately 10,500 category "D" claims submitted by fifty Governments and eight offices of three international organisations, seeking a total of approximately US$10 billion in compensation.

7 posted on 01/14/2005 8:30:30 AM PST by vincenzzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vincenzzo

The reparations are for the War and Occupation of Kuwait by Sadaam and his Iraqi armies -- standard MO after wars of aggression lost by the aggressor. Capisco that perhaps you should go back to your lefty friends and the Guardian -- you will be happier there.


8 posted on 01/14/2005 10:22:22 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson