Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't agree with the rhetoric of the first part of this AP article, but I must admit that the inaugurations cost too much, especially in this times, because of the need to prevent terroristic attacks etc. Security costs are very expensive and we could find another way for "celebrating freedom and honoring service". I would have liked a scaled back event, even if I like President Bush.
1 posted on 01/13/2005 7:20:55 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: alessandrofiaschi

IP ON AP


122 posted on 01/14/2005 5:19:11 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
"Some Now Question Cost of Inauguration"

Mostly, those on the outside looking in!
Bwahahahaha!

123 posted on 01/14/2005 5:57:00 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Apparently these "some" were OK with clinton's spending.

And they seem to be OK with the feds' $2 trillion of annual non-defense spending.


129 posted on 01/14/2005 8:49:37 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Let's look through the archives for his screed against Clintoon's 2nd inaugural, shall we?
130 posted on 01/14/2005 10:45:05 AM PST by Mr. K (all your tagline are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

I hope President Bush walks out and lights a victory cigar with a $100 dollar bill.


138 posted on 01/14/2005 1:03:43 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

They didn't complain when Clinton held his party. This is a celebration of our Democracy.


142 posted on 01/14/2005 3:18:32 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Will Lester. A liberal masquerading as an objective journalist. See, AP does have an agenda and its liberal journalists have opinions like every one else but they think the American people are too stupid to notice what they're doing, that they miss the blatant bias in opinion pieces dressed up as straightforward news stories. As for the issue at hand - so what? The Inauguration is being paid for with privately raised funds. Its one event in our nation's history in which NOT a single dollar of hard-earned taxpayers' money is being spent. Libs are seething with hatred, rage and bile at President Bush and to them its also illegitimate to have a public function in which there's no stealing from the taxpayers' wallets. And they can't be happy about a unique event which happens only in America. A peaceful assumption or re-assumption of power is rare across this world. We've been doing it successfully in America for two centuries. The Left is so psychotically worked up about President Bush that it can't be happy for the American people, for our country or for our President. They still don't get it why they lost. Go figure.


153 posted on 01/14/2005 4:23:02 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

President Bush should agree and since DC loves making laws they should pass a new one. From here on out the people of America shall not celebrate the election of a new President in any manner that exceeds the price of a tailgate party at a football game (Professional or college game of course).

We should stop having "balls" and make the limp wristed pantie wearing sodomite loving liberals have one big picnic on the Whitehouse lawn. BYO of course.


159 posted on 01/14/2005 4:32:25 PM PST by winodog (I am gonna stop calling them liberals. They are humanists. Liberal is actually a good word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
If I recall, 40 million is less than the clinton's last junket to Africa when they took along a large entourage including Chelsea
161 posted on 01/14/2005 4:33:35 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi

We visited this topic some time ago.

Getting more than a little late.

I wouldn't mind increasing the wages etc. of hotel etc. staff in DC, if more of them were more patriotic.

As it is, I'd rather the troops got at least half this much and the events were scaled way back in costs but not celebration.


174 posted on 01/15/2005 6:33:49 AM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
but I must admit that the inaugurations cost too much,

And who are you to tell a private company how to spend their own money ?
185 posted on 01/17/2005 7:43:01 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
When they Win they can do it on the Cheap! This Country can do both an Inaugaration and send $$$Billions to Indochina.

Pray for W and Our Troops

192 posted on 01/17/2005 8:10:52 PM PST by bray (The Rather-hate Scandal was to support Michael Maroon's Fraudumentary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Roosevelt in 1945 was a very sick man and we now know he was suffering heart problems and who knows what else.
That was the reason he had such a restrained Inauguration.
A very poor example to use by Democrats.
Also all of this money is private donations and it cannot be used for other purposes other than what is was donated for.
Ir can't go for more Tsunami relief or more tanks or more armored Hummers.
Where was all this outrage when Clinton took 1000 of his best buddies to Africa or China and what about his Inaugurations, what did they cost?
I am sick and tired of the Double Standard crap from the Left. Maybe Bush should have toned it down but it's his call and not the Government's money paying for it.
195 posted on 01/17/2005 8:23:57 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson