I don't agree with the rhetoric of the first part of this AP article, but I must admit that the inaugurations cost too much, especially in this times, because of the need to prevent terroristic attacks etc. Security costs are very expensive and we could find another way for "celebrating freedom and honoring service". I would have liked a scaled back event, even if I like President Bush.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: alessandrofiaschi
President Bush's second inauguration will cost tens of millions of dollars $40 million alone in private donations for the balls, parade and other invitation-only parties.It's so horrible when people spend their own money in a manner that the AP doesn't approve of.
2 posted on
01/13/2005 7:23:12 PM PST by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: alessandrofiaschi
good points. But this is a tough call.
To: alessandrofiaschi
Except .. if this were a Kerry inauguration - would this subject even be spoken of .. I think NOT! That's why they can go pound sand!!! I don't care what it costs!
4 posted on
01/13/2005 7:24:37 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Will Lester is a lefty hack trying to make a big deal out of nothing.
5 posted on
01/13/2005 7:25:00 PM PST by
Pikamax
SomeWhining Liberal Democrats Now Question Cost of Inauguration
6 posted on
01/13/2005 7:27:11 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(FReepers, Do NOT let the voter fraud stories die!!!! (Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name))
To: alessandrofiaschi
People and the press bitch when Republicans do anything. They cried when Mrs. Reagan got new dishes, with private money, for the WH.
Did you or the press speak out when Clinton was having the party? or when he spent $40 million to take his family and a 100% democratic delegation to China? or dig a tunnel for traffic in Boston?
8 posted on
01/13/2005 7:30:32 PM PST by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Redneck from a red city, in a red county, in a red state.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
$40 million alone in private donations
Once again the liberals want to tell people how to spend their money. Their own pocket money. Not their tax money, mind you, which gets spent by others whether we like it or not. This is plain hypocrisy on the liberals part. Not one penny of theirs is being spent in this $40 million but they can see such better uses for this money. I can too. Destroy the pro-abortion lobby. Now, get out of my face liberals and go to that party that Ted is throwing.
9 posted on
01/13/2005 7:34:04 PM PST by
taxesareforever
(Just can't seem to get enough protection for criminals.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
any chance you got a valid source link for this piece
11 posted on
01/13/2005 7:35:59 PM PST by
Texas_Jarhead
(I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
To: alessandrofiaschi
I don't agree with the rhetoric of the first part of this AP article, but I must admit that the inaugurations cost too much, especially in this times, because of the need to prevent terroristic attacks etc Both of Clinton's inaugurations were close to 30 million each, the first "in the worst American economy in 50 years" or so he said. Bush hardly had an inauguration in his first term and if DC can't spend a small part of that 250 million dollars in HSA grants on security then there needs to be an investigation into why not.
13 posted on
01/13/2005 7:36:37 PM PST by
Texasforever
(It's hard to kiss the lips at night that chew your butt out all day long.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Funny...I don't remember any such squawking from the Leftist media at Carter's or Clinton's inaugural expenses...
14 posted on
01/13/2005 7:37:04 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(If we're not supposed to eat animals, how come they're made of meat?)
To: alessandrofiaschi
I can't believe the leftists are complaining about the cost of the inauguration instead of the cost of government.
15 posted on
01/13/2005 7:37:06 PM PST by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Would the same complainers have told Kerry to have an inauguration "on the cheap"?
19 posted on
01/13/2005 7:40:55 PM PST by
syriacus
(Was Margaret Hassan murdered because she could have testified about the oil for food corruption?)
To: alessandrofiaschi
This is such a flaming bunch of bull-loney. The $40 million is
private money. Would these people be forking it over for body-armor, or tsunami victims when they've likely already donated to the tsunami victims?
Why can't we give to the tsunami victims, AND have a party?
And, please! Mark Cuban, who gave a million dollars to some lame reality show, has a lot of room to complain about how money's being spent.
20 posted on
01/13/2005 7:41:41 PM PST by
sinkspur
("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Liberal BS. If Kerry got elected, the parties would be limitless.
21 posted on
01/13/2005 7:41:46 PM PST by
Poser
(Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
To: alessandrofiaschi
I see that you have only been here since November 3, so perhaps you are unaware that the Inauguration is mostly funded by PRIVATE donations. No tax money is being used for the balls.
This whining is simply a leftist tactic to suck the joy out of the festivities. I am ignoring it, as this is what they do about anything to do with Republicans.
To: alessandrofiaschi
Does anyone think that we would hear this crap if it was for Kerry?
26 posted on
01/13/2005 7:46:09 PM PST by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Clinton had big parties, tents on the White House Lawn, and huge formal dinners in the White House all through his eight years in office. He never stopped wining and dining the Washington press corps. And all that was at taxpayer expensive. Clinton is also estimated to have spent a good part of a billion dollars flying thousands of his hangers-on around the world at taxpayer expense. Hillary had a government plane to campaign in at taxpayer expense, even though she held no public office.
I'd say all these liberal reporters are bad because Bush's friends are giving him a big party at their own expense, and NONE OF THEM ARE INVITED.
28 posted on
01/13/2005 7:47:07 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: alessandrofiaschi
I disagree.
We are winning.
The ceremony shows our strength.
Every military unit has formal ceremonies each year for just that reason....to show they are strong, organized, and healthy.
32 posted on
01/13/2005 7:50:41 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: alessandrofiaschi
For $40 million your favorite sports team could sign an above average athlete to a multi-year contract.
Not a lot of money, when you think about it.
To: alessandrofiaschi
This is a tough one. One can only watch so many hollywood gala events where they decry this excess without it affecting you. Can that many people in expensive suits and limousines be that wrong?
36 posted on
01/13/2005 7:52:11 PM PST by
LearnsFromMistakes
(Compassion is not defined by how much of other peoples money you wish to give away.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson