Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Arrested After Ricin Seen in Home
FOX News ^ | January 13, 2005 | AP

Posted on 01/13/2005 6:13:01 PM PST by dumpdaschle

OCALA, Fla. — A man was arrested after authorities allegedly found the deadly toxin ricin stashed in a cardboard box at his home along with a small cache of weapons, officials said Thursday.

Steven Michael Ekberg, 22, faces up to 10 years if convicted of possession of a biological agent. FBI agents said they didn't believe Ekberg, arrested Wednesday, had any connection with terrorist groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ekbergsmeckberg; michaelekberg; ricin; steveekberg; stevenekberg; stevenmekberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: dumpdaschle
The local sotories are the best place for info.

Ekberg's mother told agents that her son purchased the ricin on the Internet.

Video of Perp walk at link.

21 posted on 01/13/2005 6:26:47 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Oh yeah, that's right Sarin. Are they similar?


22 posted on 01/13/2005 6:27:59 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
Can't really remeber. It's the chemical that was used in the attack in the Tokyo subways a few years back. Killed a dozen or so and injured hundreds. Many still have breathing problems and some got dain bramage.

Nope, Ricin was NOT used by Aum Shinryko on the Tokyo subways; it was Sarin.

That they only managed to kill 12 people with actual nerve gas is an indication of the fevered overhype of Chemical weapons as "Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Only 5% of the casualties in World War I were from chemicals. Only 1% of Iranian casualties in the Iran-Iraq War were from chemicals. And this is with thousands of tons of chemicals used.

It's sort of ridiculous to lump chems in with nukes. No comparison.

23 posted on 01/13/2005 6:27:59 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
No - That was Serin (sp?). This is Ricin and it comes from a peas sized been that incidentally, also produces Castor Oil. The husk of the bean actually has the poison. It is located just beneath the outer husk surface and is quite thin. In fact, assuming a completely intact bean, it could be ingested and, if not chewed, will likely pass through the system.

Doesn't take much at all of this stuff to be lethal and there is no cure or antidote. Death is painful and extended, taking up to three days. Symptoms are severe abdominal pain, bleeding internally, etc.

24 posted on 01/13/2005 6:30:34 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

Sarin is a chemical weapon and Ricin is a bio weapon.


25 posted on 01/13/2005 6:31:22 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (PEST/Suicide Hotline 1-800-BUSH-WON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

But aren't chemical weapons much easier to make and distribute than nukes? And although they are not as deadly, don't many of the exposed have life long problems related to the exposure?


26 posted on 01/13/2005 6:32:04 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Nope - They both are chemical. Ricin is a poison not a biological agent like sat Anthrax.
27 posted on 01/13/2005 6:32:52 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Sarin is a chemical weapon and Ricin is a bio weapon.

Wrong. They're both chemical weapons. Ricin doesn't "infect" you. It's simply a poison, making it a chemical weapon.

28 posted on 01/13/2005 6:33:14 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: drt1

sat = say


29 posted on 01/13/2005 6:33:31 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I thought Bio Weapons were those that cause disease or infections, that sort of thing. Isn't ricin classified as a chemical weapon?


30 posted on 01/13/2005 6:33:44 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
But aren't chemical weapons much easier to make and distribute than nukes? And although they are not as deadly, don't many of the exposed have life long problems related to the exposure?

Chemical weapons are easier to make and distribute than nukes.

Thing is they're less efficient in killing people than high explosives.

Any time and money a terrorist wastes fiddling with chemical weapons, when they could have used that time and money on high explosives, is time and money wasted.

Heck, the members of Aum Shinryko probably would have killed more people if they'd just gotten on the Tokyo subway cars with Machetes and started hacking away, instead of setting up Sarin releases.

The thing about chemical weapons is that for whatever complex reason people are more creeped out from dying from chemicals than they are of dying from being blown apart or burned to death. Same thing is true of radiation.

31 posted on 01/13/2005 6:36:05 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: drt1

Do you think he was planning on poisoning someone? If he had been able to use the poison, is it traceable? I mean, would an autopsy reveal the poison?


32 posted on 01/13/2005 6:36:24 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I think it qualifies as a biological agent. It's a protein from castor beans, so while it's not biological in the sense that anthrax or weaponised small-pox are (as it doesn't cause infection and so forth), it still is a biological agent.


33 posted on 01/13/2005 6:38:47 PM PST by Andy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

And thus the possible reason they used it. I think he wanted to send a message more than cause mass carnage. The leader of that group was kind of exposure hungry wasn't he. I mean, I remember seeing a picture of him after he was caught and he was smiling at the camera I think.


34 posted on 01/13/2005 6:39:01 PM PST by phoenix0468 (One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
While I'm not an expert he could probably have poisoned someone and they would have come down with severe abdominal pain within hours. I think that, unless you are looking for it you might not detect it. An autopsy would show damage which I would hope Wald lead to the appropriate tests.

Problem with someone like this nut case is that this process would probably take some time - Maybe weeks. In the meantime he could be delivering doses to others before the threat was known. Given the time delay from the point of poisoning until actual sickness would also make it difficult to tie the perp to the scene.

35 posted on 01/13/2005 6:43:08 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: drt1

Wald = would (Da*n spell checker!)


36 posted on 01/13/2005 6:44:38 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
So he had a stash of ricin on hand for medicinal purposes?

Maybe he was going to invite some Puerto Rican friends over for Ricin Beans.

37 posted on 01/13/2005 6:45:18 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
The thing about chemical weapons is that for whatever complex reason people are more creeped out from dying from chemicals than they are of dying from being blown apart or burned to death. Same thing is true of radiation.

Exactly right. I have long said that you could scrape the radium from a few hundred wristwatches, dump it on Wall Street, phone the media and say that there's been a 'radioactive release', and the government would have to admit, 'Well yes, there was some radioactive material leaked', and all hell breaks loose. You'd have to shut down the street and have it decontaminated- not because there's any real danger-- but because the public hears ' radioactive contamination'.

You could probably eat the stuff with a spoon-- but the media would gleefully blow it into a huge, big deal and people would panic like cattle.

38 posted on 01/13/2005 6:46:27 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

If he's bored and wanting to search the net for something to make, why not make paper mache or a batch of brownies? Why ricin?


39 posted on 01/13/2005 6:49:55 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (I feel so naked not having JEB as my governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Andy Ross
I think it qualifies as a biological agent. It's a protein from castor beans, so while it's not biological in the sense that anthrax or weaponised small-pox are (as it doesn't cause infection and so forth), it still is a biological agent.

Not to split hairs, but that just makes it organic, not a biologic agent. A biological agent is alive, as in a virus or bacterium. It spreads not merely from the original vector, but then from host to host to host. It's a disease.

40 posted on 01/13/2005 6:50:04 PM PST by Ramius (Gregoirovich Nyet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson