Posted on 01/13/2005 5:47:14 PM PST by TexKat
I think the most recent report came a few months before the election. It showed a large WMD program that could be taken quickly to production.
hmmm...didn't think about that. Does Baker have Saudi clients?
Does it occur to anyone else that we wouldn't even be there if Baker et al hadn't screwed the pooch in the first Gulf War? Even a token backing for the Kurd/Shia uprising would have carried the day.
Wed Jan 12, 2005 07:09 PM ET
Charles Duelfer, the CIA special adviser who led the ISG's weapons search, has returned home and is expected next month to issue a final addendum to his September report concluding that prewar Iraq had no WMD stockpiles, officials said.
True
What then? Never leave?
I'm afraid we are not even "kicking" Iraq's butt.
No. Take what we found with us to include all the program information. Make it clear that if any WMDs turn up (at any time) we'll return.
I don't think there's any contention between the two; they play different roles. You can't have your SecDef say something like this. It should come from some éminence grise who is not now part of the Administration. That way it doesn't sound like it's actually part of Administration policy... yet. Baker is perfect.
Go to google.com and type in james baker saudi and read about Baker & Botts and all the other James "F@#K the Jews" Baker Saudi connections.
You really think this is orchestrated kabuki theater? What makes you think so? It'd be comforting to think the Admin's got it under control, but I don't share your faith.
Let's not forget to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities on our way out the door.
I agree.
At a time when there will be little loss of life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.