To: AndyTheBear
look at the date. it is old news for us, but an earthshattering sea change for the technical/liberal MSM to actually cover this. Buckhead and FR have changed the media world!
note that Nature rejected the paper and it went over to a "blog" on the internet, and now is getting more and more traction with those who can no longer stomach the monolithic leftist lie. that is the classical breakout, and very similar to the way the rathergate fiasco came about.
kyoto fans will be deeply saddened (but watch them claim it is necessary anyway!)
9 posted on
01/13/2005 4:33:28 PM PST by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: chilepepper
I had read the paper back when it had come out (I occasionally frequent junkscience.com and co2science.com). I hope your right about it getting traction. The global warming as science shake down has gone on long enough.
10 posted on
01/13/2005 4:38:29 PM PST by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: chilepepper
kyoto fans will be deeply saddened (but watch them claim it is necessary anyway!) It is neccessary! How else to limit progress? How else to limit increasing wealth? How else to end the increase in life expectancy? How else to reduce the world's growing food supply etc etc etc?
48 posted on
01/13/2005 8:24:32 PM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(Liberalism: The irrational fear of self reliance.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson