Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

When it comes to Bush MSM's motto is see no good, hear no good, say no good.
1 posted on 01/13/2005 12:37:18 PM PST by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Maigret
In the first three months of the fiscal year that began last October, cash outlays by the federal government increased by 6.1 percent

It's the spending that matters most in the long run. Why should spending be up 6.1% with a Republican president and congress? They have totally sold us out on the "less government" concept.

2 posted on 01/13/2005 12:40:20 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

What? The sky's not falling?


3 posted on 01/13/2005 12:41:25 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Should be dropping faster, and it will be. The Administration is aiming for a "no-growth" budget this year. If it passes, we could be looking at a balanced budget before 2008.


4 posted on 01/13/2005 12:42:15 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

"In the first three months of the fiscal year that began last October, cash outlays by the federal government increased by 6.1 percent while tax collections grew by 10.5 percent. When more money comes in than goes out, the deficit shrinks."

What is he talking about? There is not more money coming in than going out, if there were then there would be a surplus, not a shrinking deficit. The mere fact that tax collections are GROWING faster than the outlays are GROWING does not mean more money is coming in than going out. This guy is supposed to be an economist?


6 posted on 01/13/2005 12:44:06 PM PST by RipSawyer ("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

I don't know how Kudlow can write and wave pom-poms at the same time. Takes talent.


8 posted on 01/13/2005 12:45:15 PM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Isn't that nice??

This year the thieves in DC will only steal about 311 billion from our grandchildren and great grandchildren, many of whom are unborn.

Whats to cheer?


14 posted on 01/13/2005 12:51:44 PM PST by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret
...in the wake of strong stock market advances over the last two years...(tax) revenues....have jumped by over 14 percent.

I have always maintained that the so-called "Clinton balanced budget" was the result of the booming stock market, which increased capital gains and dividend incomes to such stratospheric levels that the budget was balanced.

When the bubble burst in 2000, six months before Bush was elected, those tax revenues collapsed.

The Democrats as so full of it when they claim that "Clinton balanced the budget" when in fact Clinton did absolutely nothing but sit on his fat butt with Monica as the economy did its bubble thing.

15 posted on 01/13/2005 12:51:49 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Add this story to the other post about a business boom in post-saddam Iraq and W will be looking my-t-fine in 4 years

Especially if we go after Syria and Iran falls on its own


16 posted on 01/13/2005 12:57:17 PM PST by Mr. K (all your tagline are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret; Willie Green

I could have sworn Willie posted this article.


17 posted on 01/13/2005 12:59:09 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret
Oh oh, the FR curmudgeons will have less the !itch about.
20 posted on 01/13/2005 1:09:46 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Yay! $100 billion less deficit. Now how about the $5+ trillion in debt?


25 posted on 01/13/2005 1:16:12 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Who's going to tell Michael Savage???


28 posted on 01/13/2005 1:29:28 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Gee, the "Guardians of Truth" ignoring this...imagine that...


29 posted on 01/13/2005 1:32:17 PM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret

Perhaps all our Bush bashing over uncontrolled spending by a GOP congress is having an effect. I hope so, this is mildly good news, but a balanced budget or even better a surplus would be much better news.


38 posted on 01/13/2005 1:59:44 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret
At this pace, the 2005 deficit is on track to drop to $355 billion from $413 billion in fiscal year 2004.

That's his idea of shrinking?

39 posted on 01/13/2005 2:15:39 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maigret
Kudlow is cherry-picking numbers or, at the very least, is not telling the whole story. Following is an analysis of this editorial:

Here’s one story you won’t find on tomorrow’s front pages: “The U.S. Budget Deficit Is Shrinking Rapidly.” The headline would be accurate, but the mainstream media is much more interested in talking down this booming economy than telling it like it is.

This week’s Treasury report on the nation’s finances for December shows a year-to-date fiscal 2005 deficit that is already $11 billion less than last year’s. In the first three months of the fiscal year that began last October, cash outlays by the federal government increased by 6.1 percent while tax collections grew by 10.5 percent. When more money comes in than goes out, the deficit shrinks.

When more money comes in than goes out, you have a surplus, something this administration has not yet experienced. What Kudlow likely means is that, when revenues grow faster than outlays, the deficit shrinks. In any case, Kudlow is correct that the deficit for the first three months of this fiscal year is about $11 billion less than the first three months of the prior fiscal year. October, November, and December of 2003 had deficits of 69.5, 43.0, and 17.6 billion respectively, for a total deficit of 130.2 billion dollars. Those three months of 2004 had deficits of 57.3, 57.9, and 3.4 billion respectively for a total deficit of 118.2 billion dollars. That is a difference of $11.6 billion. However, the difference for December alone was $14.2 (17.6 - 3.4) billion. Hence, Kudlow is basing his entire argument that the deficit is shrinking on December alone. In any case, Kudlow continues:

At this pace, the 2005 deficit is on track to drop to $355 billion from $413 billion in fiscal year 2004. As a fraction of projected gross domestic product, the new-year deficit will descend to 2.9 percent compared with last year’s deficit share of 3.6 percent.

Kudlow must be using some new type of math here. At the pace of $11.6 billion dollars every 3 months, the deficit would drop about $46.4 billion in a year. Kudlow, however, is projecting a drop of $58 (413 - 355) billion. That would be $14.5 billion every three months.

In the next paragraph, Kudlow goes on to say that this shrinking of the deficit has been caused by an "explosion of tax revenues" that has been "prompted by the tax-cut-led economic growth of the past eighteen months". He continues:

With 50 percent cash-bonus expensing for the purchase of plant and equipment, productivity-driven corporate profits ranging around 20 percent have generated a 45 percent rise in business taxes. At lower income-tax rates, employment gains of roughly 2.5 million are throwing off more than 6 percent in payroll-tax receipts. Personal tax revenues are rising at a near 9 percent pace.

The first graph and table at http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/mts.html shows the receipts, outlays, and surplus or deficit over every three-month period since 1998. As can be seen, corporate tax receipts did rise from 43.2 to 62.4 billion (in October to December) for a rise of nearly 45 percent. However, they are only up about 12 percent from their level of $55.7 billion in the same period of 2001.

Similarly, personal tax revenues did rise from $198.7 billion to $216 billion, an increase of about 8.7 percent. However, they are still down about 4.6 percent from their level of $226.3 billion in October to December of 2001. On the other hand, receipts from employment and general retirement (chiefly payroll taxes) are up about 12.4 percent since October to December of 2001, similar to corporate taxes. Hence, the receipts most affected by the tax cuts are down about 4.6 percent while the other receipts are up about 12 percent.

A clearer view of the trend can be seen in the second graph and table at the aforementioned URL. They show the receipts, outlays, and surplus or deficit over every twelve-month period since 1998. As can be seen, total receipts went down from early 2001 to mid 2003 and have just recovered back to about where they were in April of 2000 (heading up) and in March of 2002 (heading down). Corporate tax receipts are just 2.5 percent below the peak they reached in January of 2001 and employment and general retirement receipts are at a new high. The laggard has been individual income taxes. They have almost recovered the level that they were in September of 1998, the earliest full year for which the Treasury has records online.

The deficit for the last 12 months (calendar year 2004) is $401 billion, nearly 12 percent below the largest deficit of $455.4 trillion reached in the 12 months ending in April of 2004. However, it's still 1.2 percent above its level one year ago (calendar year 2003). In any event, Kudlow concludes the editorial:

A supply-side tax-reform movement, a shrinking budget deficit, newfound spending discipline, and a determination to confound conventional wisdom by reforming Social Security has George W. Bush’s second term off to a roaring start — even before he is officially sworn in.

In fact, the deficit and individual income tax receipts have just begun to recover from their lows reached in late 2003 and early 2004. The only "roaring" to be heard has been in spending and, to a lesser extent, those receipts whose tax rates have not been cut.

The latest version of this story can be found at http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/kudlow3.html. In addition, following is the second graph referenced above:


43 posted on 01/17/2005 2:25:55 AM PST by remember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson