Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
Why all the hostility?? Just use common sense. This story has been flying around all week. Do you not think that if it were true that Kid Rock would be performing at the ball and seeing all this controversy spring up around this performance they wouldn't have issued a statement asap??

I have a hard time believing that there wouldn't have been something along the lines of, "Kid Rock is deeply saddened by the controversy surrounding his performance that the (Whatever) Ball. He has been a strong supporter of the war on terror, the USO, and President Bush's reelection...blah blah blah..." issued the second this group started criticizing his (non)appearance at this ball.
42 posted on 01/13/2005 8:49:52 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: retrokitten
Do you not think that if it were true that Kid Rock would be performing at the ball and seeing all this controversy spring up around this performance they wouldn't have issued a statement asap??

Exactly! He or his reps never denied it at all, did they, until after it was official they wouldn't play.

Then it was the "oh, we were never going to play in the first place" line.

If they weren't playing and didn't want to play they would have denied it on day one.

They didn't. I am sure it is true that he was never going to play. He just wanted to to restart a moribund "career".

50 posted on 01/13/2005 9:21:37 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson