[mlc9852]

Wonder how much was spent on this bright idea? Are there really people out there who don't understand how the HIV virus can be transmitted?

[Nathan-1729]

Wonder how much was spent on this bright idea? Are there really people out there who don't understand how the HIV virus can be transmitted?

Yes. Particularly in Asia and Africa. There's also the issue of people thinking HIV is something that 'other people' get.

[agere_contra]

Are there really people out there who don't understand how the HIV virus can be transmitted?

Well, I understand the theory. I just say that the AIDs industry needs to prove the HIV theory, not just assert it.

The HIV virus has not (yet) been isolated, either in the laboratory, or from a putatively HIV-ridden patient.

The serological tests for HIV (ELISA, WB used across the world to determine who is infected with HIV and who isn't) have not yet been calibrated against the HIV virus. Consequently they are of no earthly use in testing for the virus. Once they are calibrated then we will know what the false-positive rate of these tests is. But the HIV virus has not (yet) been isolated.

Similarly, the PCR count methodology (often claimed to allow tracking of HIV RNA in AIDS experiments) can only be primed from a isolate of the HIV virus. But the HIV virus has not (yet) been isolated. God knows what AIDs scientists are actually tracking in their experiments, but the next time you hear that "HIV is mutating all the time, we just can't get a bead on it", you'll know why. They're tracking a different random nucleic fragment everytime.

The epidemiology of AIDs is that of toxin exposure or of a deficiency disease, NOT the explosive epidemiology of a virus.

90% of all AIDs deaths in the US have been from liver failure: a COD typically indicative of toxin exposure and not of pathogen exposure.

Those 1000's of AIDs deaths in the US were being treated with high doses of the lethally toxic drug AZT when they died. It's all so mysterious