Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Several of the campaigns said that Dean is all but a shoo-in to be on the final ballot

I don't think so. Kerry and his Son Chris Heinz are not endorsing Dean!

1 posted on 01/12/2005 9:18:51 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: areafiftyone

This is rich. Kerry is so stupid & so full of himself that he doesn't even realize that HE lost the election. As usual it's someone else's fault - HE did nothing wrong, there's nothing wrong with HIM, HE should have won.


2 posted on 01/12/2005 9:21:31 AM PST by Semper Vigilantis (How much aid did the world give Florida last year?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Now, whatever happened to the principles behind the Democratic Unity Dinner??? Remember that from last year?

And whatever will happen to Terry McAuliffe? I must admit, I will miss that guy's stupidity on the Sunday shows.


3 posted on 01/12/2005 9:23:19 AM PST by andie74 (Proud Resident of Fly-Over Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Al Sharpton's got my vote.


4 posted on 01/12/2005 9:24:34 AM PST by schaketo (http://www.gp.org/ Convince progressives to join the Green Party – Divide and conquer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Sorta reminds me of the White Star Line interviewing Captains for the Titanic...


5 posted on 01/12/2005 9:25:09 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Clinton/Byah???


6 posted on 01/12/2005 9:25:15 AM PST by IamConservative (To worry is to misuse your imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I caught a bit of their lineup on C-Span over the weekend. They were each asked to answer a question regarding their vision of their party (or some such thing). The responses were really uninspiring. It remains a fact that the only thing that seems to set any of them on fire is their hatred of Bush.
9 posted on 01/12/2005 9:30:35 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Hillary will cut Kerry to pieces when the time comes.


12 posted on 01/12/2005 9:33:55 AM PST by Peach (The Cl intons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I'm not sure who I want to see more in '08 - Kerry or Gore!

I can't imagine the Dems would be idiotic enough to trot out either of those two ugly bridesmaids again, but I can hope.

14 posted on 01/12/2005 9:34:29 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

If Hillary finds out that Kerry is making a run in '08...watch you backside John!


16 posted on 01/12/2005 9:39:31 AM PST by Wheee The People (Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang. Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Kerry is toast! He lost and only Republicans run loosers. The only threat out of that field is Evan Bayh. Hes waaay to moderate win the DNC nod.


17 posted on 01/12/2005 9:43:07 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

The Kerry Clinton battle will be amazing to watch.


20 posted on 01/12/2005 10:03:59 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Meanwhile, Dean, who formally announced yesterday, is emerging as the clear front-runner in the race, according to strategists for the other campaigns.

Last I read they were asking McAuliffe to stay on because a lot of Dems were afraid of Dean as DNC chairman.

23 posted on 01/12/2005 10:11:26 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I think I'd be a lot more careful about refusing an offer from hillary than one from kerry.

Interesting to see if Richardson will be willing to go head-to-head with his former associate.

Kerry loves himself so much he simply can't conceive that everyone else doesn't love him too.


28 posted on 01/12/2005 10:28:43 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Poor Effin doesn't realize that being the loser he is, he's utterly irrelevant.


30 posted on 01/12/2005 11:37:57 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

The party is too mad at him for bumbling this election away, no way they let him get a second chance.

Even if they do, the Swift Vets are still going to be there, telling the TRUTH about John F'n Kerry.


31 posted on 01/12/2005 11:40:29 AM PST by Reform4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone; Howlin; Dales; Doctor Raoul; Nick Danger; Dog Gone; wardaddy; rdb3; mhking; ...
"Over the past six weeks, Sen. Evan Bayh (Ind.), Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y,), New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, Virginia Gov. Mark Warner and Kerry have been in touch with..."

There's your list for 2008 on the Dem side. Not Dean. Not Gore. Notice that three of the Dem names are from our Red states: Bayh, Richardson, and Warner. The other two have an entrenched base of hyper-radical left-wing supporters: Hillary and Kerry.

Once again for 2008, all of the Dems' serious candidates will be White, and all but one of them are male.

Richardson on the above list is merely a placeholder...at best jockeying for a VP nod due to his past pro-Clinton record among Dems and his anti-gay behavior as Governor of New Mexico.

That leaves them with just 4 candidates for the top nomination in '08. Their names are above. There will not be another (at least, not seriously).

...Well, at least if they handle Dean properly. One would think that giving him the DNC nod would get him out of the way for '08, but perhaps they fear his kingmaker ability if he holds that slot.

On the other hand, if Roemer gets the DNC nod, then the Dems get a pro-life front in the DNC and Senate (Roemer and Reid)...and that opens the Dems up for Roemer to favor Bayh in the '08 Dem primaries.

Do they want Dean out of the way...that they are doing Dean a "Favor" by giving him the DNC nod? Or do they want the pro-life front by giving the DNC nod to Roemer (gambling that he goes for Bayh)?

Clearly Bayh thinks that he has enough of a shot at getting the Presidential nomination in '08 that he isn't even *trying* for the DNC nod (ditto for Warner). Bayh, of course, is a very real threat to flip a Red state over to their side, instead. That's something that Hillary and Kerry haven't demonstrated that they could do very well.

But for Bayh to win the Dem primaries, he'd need strong Party backing (to keep their base of radicals happy). Frankly, that could happen with *either* Dean or Roemer in the DNC chair, under the right circumstances.

Of course, Kerry and Hillary are both capable of winning the Dem primaries; their electoral deficiency is in winning nationally...a feat that requires flipping Heartland states over to voting Coastal.

Three of the above players, it's worth noting, are from Indiana: Bayh, Warner, and Roemer. That's no coincidence. The Dems are going to put a Red State centrist on their '08 ticket, no question. There will be no Hillary/Kerry ticket, nor Kerry/Hillary.

32 posted on 01/12/2005 12:04:22 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson