Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JesseJane
To sum up:

July 2003: Berger starts visits to Archives (he later admits to taking notes and leaving with them, against the rules).

September 2, 2003: Berger visits the Archives. This is when the staff notices documents missing and devise a system for his next visit. There are two versions here: One is an Archives employee called Bruce Lindsey and informed of the missing docs. Lanny Breuer denies this version (see timeline line at #160).

September 23, 2003: The Assistant to the President and Director of Presidential Personnel contacts Weinstein, a potential replacement for the then director of the Archives, Carlin.

October 2003: Berger returns and again removes documents and is confronted. He acquires an attorney, Lanny Breuer, previously one of the WH counsel for you-know-who.

Shortly after DOJ is notified of Berger's actions.

December 5, 2003: Alberto Gonzales, WH counsel for President Bush, calls Carlin the Archives Director, and requests his resignation.

January 2004: FBI brought into Berger matter.

July 2004: Hearing for Carlin's potential replacement, Weinstein. WH does not reveal openly that Carlin's resignation was requested, nor do they reveal the reason.

265 posted on 01/12/2005 10:13:32 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
"Hearing for Carlin's potential replacement, Weinstein. WH does not reveal openly that Carlin's resignation was requested, nor do they reveal the reason."

Really, our side is way too kind at times. Then again, it was part of an ongoing investigation, so that seems like the right thing to do.

281 posted on 01/12/2005 10:26:54 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson