Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 01/11/2005 2:16:26 PM PST by Lead Moderator, reason:

Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1318543/posts



Skip to comments.

Olbermann: CBS a Victim, FNC the Villain for Running Swift Ads
MRC ^ | Tuesday January 11, 2005 | Brent Baker,Brad Wilmouth

Posted on 01/11/2005 1:41:07 PM PST by fight_truth_decay

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: fight_truth_decay

bah who cares what olhberman thinks or says


21 posted on 01/11/2005 1:53:07 PM PST by puppets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick
The Swift Boat ads were just that, ads! The were produced and developed by private citizens, NOT journalists working for a network. They weren't attempting to masquerade their ad as a "hard news story".

Not only that (and it was a great point you made!), but John Kerry never personally addressed the specifics of the Swift Boat Ads. So how does Keith Olbermann know that these ads were "full of distortions?" The answer is, he doesn't.

22 posted on 01/11/2005 1:53:20 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Media bias is very easy to expose; just substitute the name of one of their beloved liberals in place of the Republican or conservative they are bashing and see if such a story would ever be reported.


23 posted on 01/11/2005 1:53:25 PM PST by E=MC<sup>2</sup> (...And on the 666th day, satan created the demonrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timeislightislife

Not good for the credibility of our nation in front of the world. A lie, is worsened when justified.
Ops4 God BLess America!


24 posted on 01/11/2005 1:54:53 PM PST by OPS4 (worth repeating)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

LOL, sure they are...in his tinfoil hat universe! The guy is totally off his rocker, imo.


25 posted on 01/11/2005 1:54:58 PM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

tried watching him since I stopped watchng OReily, no joy there. The guy is just a looney.


26 posted on 01/11/2005 1:55:00 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

27 posted on 01/11/2005 1:55:46 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Journalists...hate to add all the qualifiers...because it detracts from the drama."- Charley Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Who is Olbermann and what's this MSNBC you're mentioning?
:-{/


28 posted on 01/11/2005 1:56:01 PM PST by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Fifteen years ago I watched about two minutes of the clown when he was a second rate sportsdude ~ he was a goof then and remains so now.


29 posted on 01/11/2005 1:57:03 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Keith has a great future ahead of him at Err America (it's like internet radio, but not as popular).


30 posted on 01/11/2005 1:57:29 PM PST by searchandrecovery (... --- ... ...---... ...---...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Can anyone say "nutcase"?

Well of course, olberman is the patron saint of the nutcases, the DUmmies.

31 posted on 01/11/2005 1:57:55 PM PST by Dane (trial lawyers are the parasites to wealth creating society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Didn't Karl Rove sue (and win) Richard Thornburgh years ago?

I remember something about Richard Thornburgh not paying his consultants and stuff, I think Rove was one of them.

32 posted on 01/11/2005 1:58:12 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Come on, he has somewhere between 5 to 7 viewers, give the guy some credit :)
33 posted on 01/11/2005 1:58:17 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 11, 2005; Page A09

A report detailing "serious and fundamental deficiencies" in a CBS News report of a disputed story involving President Bush's National Guard service has already caused damage to third-place CBS "Evening News" ratings, driving down its appeal to advertisers.

For nearly a decade, Rather's "Evening News" has languished in third place in the ratings, following ABC and NBC, whose "Nightly News" broadcast typically has been the top-rated, helmed by Tom Brokaw until he stepped down last year. In the weeks following the Sept. 8 report, ratings for CBS's evening newscast dipped and then flattened out, said Leslie Moonves, Viacom co-president.

The drop in ratings meant that CBS "Evening News" and other CBS News programs had to give advertisers more commercial time to make up for lost audience numbers that are guaranteed in contracts, said John Rash, a television advertising buyer with Campbell Mithun. And it couldn't have come at a worse time, Rash said.

"The irony is the report aired on '60 Minutes II,' and yet with Dan Rather being the public personification of the problem, its effect has been most noticeable on the 'CBS Evening News,' " Rash said. "They have not been able to regain much traction and most importantly have lost a key opportunity to erode NBC's ratings lead in the wake of Tom Brokaw's departure."

For the last week of 2004, NBC's "Nightly News" was seen in an average of 8.4 million households, with ABC's "World News Tonight with Peter Jennings" second at 7.7 million households and CBS's "Evening News" at 6 million households, according to Nielsen Media Research.

A 30-second ad on a network evening news broadcast typically costs about $50,000, one-tenth of what a 30-second commercial can go for on a top-rated entertainment program, such as CBS's "CSI."

"The [overall] economic hit was not a great one," Moonves said. " 'The Early Show' and the news magazines make more money than the evening news."

Ad revenue from the "Evening News" accounts for only about 10 percent of the total revenue of the CBS News division, Moonves said.

34 posted on 01/11/2005 1:59:14 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Olberman will, illogically try to compare Armstrong Williams to CBS, but of course he won't mention his hand in intentionally misleading viewers about Ohio's vote in the presidential election. He's such a self-serving blow-hard, desperate for ratings, and pathetically out of touch with reality.
35 posted on 01/11/2005 2:02:07 PM PST by YaYa123 (@No Laughable Liar Should Escape Public Ridicule.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Olbermann then argued that the case for any liberal bias has been discredited

"Look Bernie, of course there's a liberal bias in the news.  All the networks tilt left." -- CBS News President ANDREW HEYWARD, to six-time Emmy award winner Bernie Goldberg, quoted HERE.

36 posted on 01/11/2005 2:02:26 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Journalists...hate to add all the qualifiers...because it detracts from the drama."- Charley Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zert_28
"Chris Matthews was on Imus this morning blaming Roger Alies and FOX News for the Rathergate fiasco. It looks like Olbermann is using the same argument."

These guys must wake up every day completely miserable and hopeless, knowing that we control every aspect of their pitiful lives.
37 posted on 01/11/2005 2:03:30 PM PST by RtWngr (Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; All

Just as with the re-election of President Bush, once again, my faith in the common-sense and clarity of thought of the American people is coming through. CBS's ratings are tanking. They can try to spin (or nuance :-))it all they want, but people know dishonesty when they see it, and are voting with their feet, as they say. They know a sacred trust has been broken, and are rejecting the source now as unreliable. I just hope when they look elsewhere on the MSM, they'll see the same thing, and do the same thing.


38 posted on 01/11/2005 2:04:09 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: YaYa123
His show occupies the prestigious # 26 spot in the cable news ratings.

If I were him, I will kill myself due to this utter failure.

40 posted on 01/11/2005 2:05:12 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson