"What data has ID collected? I know of none other than misinterpreted Bible verses."
When I said "data" I was referring to what is observeable in the world - life forms, fossils, DNA, etc. All the same things evolutionary proponents use to state their case. I draw different conclusions from the same observable data.
BTW - Would you please stop tying me to ID proponents. Most of those folks would not accept a creationist. Creationists and ID folks are two separate groups.
"When I said "data" I was referring to what is observeable in the world - life forms, fossils, DNA, etc. All the same things evolutionary proponents use to state their case. I draw different conclusions from the same observable data.
BTW - Would you please stop tying me to ID proponents. Most of those folks would not accept a creationist. Creationists and ID folks are two separate groups."
If you draw different conclusions that the Theory of Evolution from scientific data, you are plainly wrong.
ID and creationists are the same. They use the Bible against science. They both use ridiculous interpretations to pretend that biology cares about creation-it doesn't.
Until you can come up with a coherent systematic explanation (theory) for the data we have, you don't have a legitimate argument. Good luck on that, because science has not been able to falsify the Theory in over 150 years. But I am sure your "observations" and "conclusions" are far more valid than the all the scientists who have worked to validate the theory and show that evolution is a fact.
Really? What "different conclusions" do you draw from the patterns of shared endogenous retroviruses in cross-species DNA comparisons? The common ancestry of evolutionary biology seems the only rational explanation. Ditto for the "fossilized" centromere in human chromosome 2, etc. etc. etc.