Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa

Well, with all due respect, let me say this. The studies you have produced have counterparts. I have yet to see anything that CONCLUSIVELY proves that second-hand smoke causes cancer, ect. Studies are biased by the folks that commission them. The facts themselves are propped up by maybes, could haves, would haves, and should haves.

Perhaps you should see my post above. If you want to say it's an annoyance, well, gee, that's fine. But it doesn't give you the right to tell a business owner that he has to cater to YOUR dislikes...go find a place that DOES.


164 posted on 01/10/2005 6:16:51 PM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: exnavychick

No, the cpa is going to FORCE BY LAW everyone to cater to his dislikes.

When I think about that, I remember that Hillary Clinton was the first one to ban smoking in the White House. I don't know how Chelsea hid it, but I'm sure she did. And I think Hillary smokes, too.


165 posted on 01/10/2005 6:21:55 PM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: exnavychick
There are no studies that prove cholesterol conclusively causes heart attacks either. Like anything else, you weigh the evidence against the risks. There are no studies that prove SHS is harmless and their are many studies that show their could be a risk.

Breathing SHS is an unnessary risk, especially if its only purpose is to accomodate someone who doesn't have the self control to weight an hour or less for a cigarette.

167 posted on 01/10/2005 6:24:32 PM PST by Raycpa (Alias, VRWC_minion,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson