To: bushfamfan
No, but I heard them on 1210am in Philly this morning. He said he liked F-9/11 and totally ripped the mission in Iraq.
3 posted on
01/10/2005 10:39:37 AM PST by
SAR
To: SAR
See, folks, he liked Fahrenheit 9/11. Says it all. And he is not religious like he claims. I could understand a rational reason in being against the war but to praise Michael Moore and the film and attack the President's reason shows what kind of person Mel Gibson is. HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE AND HAS NEVER BEEN.
To: SAR
Well, that really is a disappointment. For starters, if he can't see the blatant propaganda in F9/11 he's as blind as a bat. How can you "like" propaganda? It's retarded. This is like a slap in the face for those who campaigned to get people to vote for Passion of the Christ.
12 posted on
01/10/2005 10:43:50 AM PST by
Trippin
To: SAR
"He said he liked F-9/11 and totally ripped the mission in Iraq."Hmmm. . .kinda hypocritical for Mel to be ripping on a war considering the types of movies he usually makes.
24 posted on
01/10/2005 10:50:38 AM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: SAR
Technically, if you are a Christian, you should be against all war anyway. I see nothing inconsistant here. He made a great movie about a part of the Bible that touched a lot of people. Jesus wasn't a republican or a democrat - I think The Passion should be completely removed from politicization.
Also, Mel Gibson isn't Michael Moore. Moore is a hateful a-hole. I can respect someone who has religious problems with the war in Iraq (include moral convictions as well). Moore wouldn't bat an eye if Clinton had gone to war. I think Gibson would stay true to his convictions, whomever the president was.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson