Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Muslims Called to Take Up Jihad (And the Brits mostly don't care)
The Washington Times ^ | January 10, 2005 | Hannah K. Strange [United Press International]

Posted on 01/10/2005 9:37:05 AM PST by quidnunc

London, England – Muslims living in Britain are facing two choices; either to migrate or to join the jihad, a key Islamic figure has said.

Sheikh Omar Bakir Muhammed, leader of the now officially disbanded Islamic militant group Al Muhajiroun told United Press International Saturday that as the covenant of security under which Muslims previously lived in Britain has been broken, Muslims must now consider themselves at war.

"And I declare we should ourselves join the global Islamic camp against the global crusade camp," he said.

What violated the covenant, according to Sheikh Omar, was the anti-terrorist legislation introduced in the United Kingdom after the 9/11 attacks. If the British government would review these policies and release those detained without trial in Belmarsh prison and elsewhere, Muslims could live at peace in Britain. Otherwise, they must prepare themselves to fight.

"The response from the Muslims will be horrendous if the British government continues in the way it treats Muslims," he said, adding that suicide bombings were a possibility.

He called on Muslims to form a new coalition united behind al-Qaida with Osama Bin Laden as their leader.

This jihadi group would replace Al-Muhajiroun, which is no longer needed, he said. By dissolving such parties the Muslim community will have to come together, and as the judge of the Sharia court in Britain, he is the one to unite them, he added.

Those who did not wish to either leave or fight would not be regarded as Muslims, said Sheikh Omar, condemning in particular the Muslim Council of Britain for urging the Muslim community to cooperate with the British government.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: globaljihad; jihadineurope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc
Those who did not wish to either leave or fight would not be regarded as Muslims, ...

Don't let the door hit you in the behind too hard on the way out. If Sharia law is so wonderful, Go back to Saudi Arabia or whatever "wonderful" Muslim country you came from.

22 posted on 01/10/2005 10:19:20 AM PST by Tamar1973 (Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats-- PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antoninartaud
Muslims are well aware that they are stronger, culturally, than their European hosts.

I agree. There are times when I find myself screaming in my mind (and sometimes physically) "DON'T THEY SEE WHAT THEY'RE DOING?? IT'S SUICIDE!" But it happens with little more than a whimper from the local populace.

Things are still on an even keel because the Muslims are only at 10-12% of the population. With til they're 25-30%. THen the fight will be engaged for certain. Another 30 years or so?

23 posted on 01/10/2005 10:21:38 AM PST by America's Resolve (awarforeurabia.blogspot.com - Watching the war for Europe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The probablem is that there is nothing on the conservative side that is even remotely comparable in influence to the BBC.

True, but I think the BBC's influence reached a peak during the Iraq war and is now plumetting. I get a lot of enjoyment watching their turmoil at the moment.

I don't think it's fair to say The Telegraph is half-liberal (if by liberal you mean left-wing) - personally I couldn't wish for a better newspaper, but maybe it's just personal taste!

there is nothing equivalent in the UK to American conservatism.

I'm sure you're right, but our Conservatives are more than capable of learning from America if we feel America is doing something better.
24 posted on 01/10/2005 10:25:20 AM PST by pau1f0rd (a British citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
I think Britain and Europe will turn around, realize they were wrong and fight the Mooslums. It will be bloody and long but they will persevere. Of course if they start now thinks will be less bloody.

It's starting in The Netherlands and Denmark already.

25 posted on 01/10/2005 10:28:41 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pau1f0rd

Ah, thanks!


26 posted on 01/10/2005 10:35:22 AM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

The Brits are not weak; they are merely diddling up the wrong tree as far as 'homeland security' goes. They have allowed the most hostile Islamic elements to move in and incite hatred against their host country, and what has the Gub'mint done to make them safer? Disarm all the real Englishmen, even their pocketknives. I suppose we'll have to ship them over a boatload of weapons on lend-lease...again...


27 posted on 01/10/2005 10:36:24 AM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: America's Resolve

"I don't know what the brits are supposed to fight with. They handed in their guns, remember? By LAW! Thats also somethimg that people seem to forget."

Try box cutters. I sense your statement is true, in that many people do not realize Britain did away with personal gun ownership. One thing that is not recoginzed in doing this, wss that many of their younger people who would have learned early as how to handle a firearm, go hunting, in short get exposer to the outdoors etc., will no longer do so. Result: Fewer next generation soldiers that are adapted to military life. Seems like a so what deal until the British Army and Royal Marines find themselves unable to find youth that are suitable for miltiary service. Same thing will happen in America. Everything has a counter action.


28 posted on 01/10/2005 10:37:24 AM PST by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sender

I suppose we'll have to ship them over a boatload of weapons on lend-lease...again...




Unfortunately I am afraid you may be right....


29 posted on 01/10/2005 10:40:18 AM PST by MikefromOhio (DO I need a new screen name? I am no longer in Iraq :) 4 to keep 2 to change so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
What we think of as Britain was founded in 1066.

Anyhow Godwinson wouldn't have lost to the Bastard if he hadn't been roughed up in a prior clash with us Norwegians, which he won, though not without luck.

30 posted on 01/10/2005 10:46:08 AM PST by Tamberlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sender

"The Brits are not weak; they are merely diddling up the wrong tree as far as 'homeland security' goes. They have allowed the most hostile Islamic elements to move in and incite hatred against their host country....".

Quite sadly I think we can almost put America into the same shoes the way things are going. We read in the 9/11 report and so many other places, about how many Muslims assemble in this country, and are trained or how should I say, encouraged to actively work agaist America. We due to our framework allow all to come here and worship as they please.
Now we have Immans who preach jihad all over the USA.


31 posted on 01/10/2005 10:55:33 AM PST by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

Just wait until they want to make their own state.
"Britistine"


32 posted on 01/10/2005 10:57:10 AM PST by bananarepublican23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

I think sadly of the words of William Blake: "We'll build a new Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land." The nation of common law, of Magna Carta, of the Enlightenment, not to mention Shakespeare, Wordwsorth, Keats, Vaughan Williams, Elgar, ad infinitum, may fall into barbarism. "O tempora, o mores!"


33 posted on 01/10/2005 10:58:46 AM PST by beckysharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bananarepublican23

"Just wait until they want to make their own state.
"Britistine""
That will happen. It is inevitable the way things are going.
And in America, lets say they demand all Americans to vacate California, then they can all move there and rename it lets say "Mecca II".


34 posted on 01/10/2005 11:03:20 AM PST by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tamberlane
Tamberlane wrote: What we think of as Britain was founded in 1066. Anyhow Godwinson wouldn't have lost to the Bastard if he hadn't been roughed up in a prior clash with us Norwegians, which he won, though not without luck.

The point is that Britain has been radi cally changed any number of times from without and within throughout recorrded history.

In addition to William, British awas radically changed by Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, James I, Cromwell Charles II and others.

Currently it is again being transformed by a combination of French philosophers in the guise of post-modernism and Islam.

The national government and local governments are truckling in the face of Muslim ultamatums.

Mob rule is apparently the order of the day since BBC honchos and playwrights are in hiding in the face of death threats, and animal rights extremists have succeeded in getting fox hunting banned.

35 posted on 01/10/2005 11:04:38 AM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

islamic jihadism is a spreading cancer in the world. its sad that more people are interested in being politically correct than recognizing the threat of this vermin.


36 posted on 01/10/2005 11:19:54 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Currently it is again being transformed by a combination of French philosophers in the guise of post-modernism and Islam.

Come on. The French po-mo philosophers, who by the way have been out of vogue even on the Seine for some years now, were always mostly laughed out of court in Britain. Oxford and Cambridge are not UC Berkeley, after all.

As to Islam, sure, there are too many Muslims there to anybody's taste except the Muslims. However, this is bunk:

The national government and local governments are truckling in the face of Muslim ultamatums.

Really? What ultimatums then? And where is the truckling, exactly?

Mob rule is apparently the order of the day since BBC honchos and playwrights are in hiding in the face of death threats, and animal rights extremists have succeeded in getting fox hunting banned.

Not sure what hiding honchos you refer to, but obviously you have something specific in mind. However, I wouldn't lose sleep over the ban on fox hunting - "the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible", as Oscar Wilde put it. It's not lack the loss of that ridiculous sport will make the Britons any less tough. Rule Britannia!

37 posted on 01/10/2005 11:25:16 AM PST by Tamberlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tamberlane
Edit: It's not like the loss...
38 posted on 01/10/2005 11:26:14 AM PST by Tamberlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tamberlane
Tamberlane wrote: [The national government and local governments are truckling in the face of Muslim ultamatums.] Really? What ultimatums then? And where is the truckling, exactly?

Truckle – To be servile or submissive

The city of Leeds wished to return a historic statue of a wild boar which was damaged during WW II to its place in a city park.

They abandoned the effort when some Muslims said thast the statue of a pis was offensive to them and they would destroy it if it was replaced.

In one of the boroughs of London a billboard advertising women's lingeré was removed when some Muslims said thast it was offensive to them.

Mob rule is apparently the order of the day since BBC honchos and playwrights are in hiding in the face of death threats, and animal rights extremists have succeeded in getting fox hunting banned. Not sure what hiding honchos you refer to, but obviously you have something specific in mind. However, I wouldn't lose sleep over the ban on fox hunting - "the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible", as Oscar Wilde put it. It's not lack the loss of that ridiculous sport will make the Britons any less tough. Rule Britannia!

The governor of the BBC is behind police protection because of death threats over the airing of the Jerry Springer opers.

The playwright who wrote that play about the Sikhs which caused a riot is in hiding because of death threats.

39 posted on 01/10/2005 12:15:50 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tamberlane
Tamberlane wrote: (The national government and local governments are truckling in the face of Muslim ultamatums.) Really? What ultimatums then? And where is the truckling, exactly?

Oh yes, and read that truckling letter written by energy minister Mike O'Brien that was published in Muslim Weekly.

40 posted on 01/10/2005 12:20:14 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson