Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So what do all of you think of this?

Other than Gingrish, Phil Graham would be another good contender.

1 posted on 01/10/2005 8:49:25 AM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: JFK_Lib

The libs hate Newt. I like him. Not sure he's the best choice though.


2 posted on 01/10/2005 8:51:27 AM PST by RushCrush (We can stand here like the French, or we can do something about it.-Marge Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

Newt will be elected Pope first.


3 posted on 01/10/2005 8:51:32 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

Newt needs to give it a rest. There is no way that he could ever be elected.


5 posted on 01/10/2005 8:53:53 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lil'freeper

Ping


6 posted on 01/10/2005 8:54:14 AM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought."-Pope JPII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

NO WAY!


7 posted on 01/10/2005 8:54:16 AM PST by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

With Hagel and Newt, I find it interesting that people who consider themselves serious candidates for the GOP nomination (and aren't total political dimwits) think there is gold in going after the first re-elected GOP President since Reagan. I wonder what poll numbers they are looking at.


8 posted on 01/10/2005 8:54:24 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

no chance no way....


9 posted on 01/10/2005 8:54:33 AM PST by MikefromOhio (DO I need a new screen name? I am no longer in Iraq :) 3 to keep 2 to change so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

might as well. liberals hate him


12 posted on 01/10/2005 8:55:13 AM PST by Kewlhand`tek (What the hell was that? I hope it was outgoing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
Newt is doing this because he's more than a little ticked off that Arlen Specterites are currently controlling the GOP in Congress. He may go as far as pulling a Theodore Roosevelt to save the GOP for conservatism.

Depending upon who gets nominated in 2008, I may support him on it.
13 posted on 01/10/2005 8:55:17 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Memo to John F. Kerry - We don't send losers to rebuild Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
Gingrich doesn't rule out presidential run

Well he should rule it out, and as soon as humanly possible.

Newt would be a disastrously bad president. (Look at the mess he made while Speaker of the House....)

15 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:20 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

I thought Newt's days of delusional fallacy were over. Guess not. Maybe he can get Rush to be VP. They can staff their entire campaign with ex-wives.


16 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:40 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

I like Newt. But no. We'd lose, big time.

Try Sanford instead. He's got all Newt's better qualities without the baggage. Plus, he's squeaky clean and the media doesn't have anything on him (yet).


17 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:52 AM PST by RockinRight (Sanford for President in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

Huh??? Are the Democrats planning to run McGovern against him.


18 posted on 01/10/2005 8:57:25 AM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
I think he's just making the media waste "demonization ammo" on him. They'll have less left over for the). real candidate (though they have a lot

And making money off a book- about time conservatives starting getting some "two-fers".

21 posted on 01/10/2005 8:59:36 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

Pure vanity on Newt's part. His personal morality record stacks up poorly against Clinton's, so I can't believe the religious crowd would go for him.


24 posted on 01/10/2005 9:01:51 AM PST by johnmilken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
Three magic words that will give Newt the presidency:

CLOSE THE BORDER

26 posted on 01/10/2005 9:02:57 AM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
Other than Gingrish, Phil Graham would be another good contender.

I don't think Gramm wants to have to answer questions about Enron. His wife Wendy who previously was the chairman of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, was on the board of directors of Enron on the auditing committee.

27 posted on 01/10/2005 9:03:52 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

Newt Gingrich will never receive my vote for President.


32 posted on 01/10/2005 9:08:14 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib
He'd do great in the office. Unfortunately, the left has succesfully equated him the the Grinch and I don't think he'd have a Chance at being elected
34 posted on 01/10/2005 9:10:55 AM PST by badmatty (http://badmatty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JFK_Lib

As much as I like Newt's positions, he did fold in the face of adversity. Now I'm not saying that he didn't have the right to say "enough is enough" and "I don't have to take this any longer," but at a time when his continued leadership was needed, he wasn't there any more. That is fine for a Congressman, a job which the founding fathers viewed as a part time, but is a showstopper for POTUS. Sorry, Newt ... Representative, Senator, commentator, or historian, sure ... but President? No.


35 posted on 01/10/2005 9:11:00 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson