Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Independent Review Panel Examining CBS News '60 Minutes Wednesday' (RATHERGATE)
Yahoo ^ | 1/10/04

Posted on 01/10/2005 7:57:09 AM PST by Valin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2005 7:57:10 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

ping


2 posted on 01/10/2005 7:58:08 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

"The panel was comprised of..."

Tough to keep reading when these "professional journalists" make such a bonehead mistake in the opening paragraph.


3 posted on 01/10/2005 8:00:39 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Never addressed the main issue...CBS illegally tried to influence the outcome of a presidential election.


4 posted on 01/10/2005 8:00:58 AM PST by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TUX; sitetest

For more
Rathergate report to be released at 10 am eastern!!
wtmj | 1/10/2005 | milwguy2303



http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1317686/posts


5 posted on 01/10/2005 8:02:46 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Yeah, what about closing down CBS or selling it to either Fox or Sinclair networks? Might be a good deal.


6 posted on 01/10/2005 8:03:18 AM PST by Bulgaricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Sr. Vice President Betsy West, Exec Producer Josh Howard, Sr. Broadcast Producer Mary Murphy, and last but not least Producer Mary Mapes - CANCELLED!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 01/10/2005 8:08:12 AM PST by FilthyHands (He who conquers endures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TUX

No political bias found. I'm surprised they took three months...


8 posted on 01/10/2005 8:10:51 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times: No cliches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I'm astonished at how bloody the housecleaning was at CBS. Although Dan should have been fired and I think it is completely disingenous to underestimate how much influence Dan had with this report.

Remember, there is bad blood between President Bush 41 and Rather, because of the interview where Pres. Bush asked Rather if he wanted his entire career judged by the time he (Rather) walked off the air and left the set empty for 7 minutes. And there is no way you can ever convince me that Rather would not try to get back at 41 through President GW Bush.


9 posted on 01/10/2005 8:12:01 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

I think they'd say that because Danny's stepping down, there was no need to take any action on him.


10 posted on 01/10/2005 8:14:19 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I must have missed it. Who'd he say was going to jail?


11 posted on 01/10/2005 8:14:24 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

"As far as the question of reporting is concerned, the bottom line is that much of the September 8th broadcast was wrong, incomplete or unfair."

"much"? Sounds like a further attempt to avoid admitting that the documents were total fakes.


12 posted on 01/10/2005 8:14:42 AM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TUX
Never addressed the main issue...CBS illegally tried to influence the outcome of a presidential election.

3rd from the last paragraph shovels this BS.....

We are also gratified that the Panel, after extensive analysis and consideration, has found that, while CBS News made numerous errors of judgment and execution in this story, these mistakes were not motivated by any political agenda. As the Report states, "The Panel does not find a basis to accuse those who investigated, produced, vetted or aired the Segment of having a political bias."

13 posted on 01/10/2005 8:14:49 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

On what charges?


14 posted on 01/10/2005 8:15:49 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
15 posted on 01/10/2005 8:18:54 AM PST by IncPen (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
The Panel found that Dan Rather was pushed to the limit in the week before the September 8th broadcast. He was finishing up the anchoring job at the 2004 Republican Convention and was covering Hurricane Frances in Florida. He asked the right questions initially, but then made the same errors of credulity and over-enthusiasm that beset many of his colleagues in regard to this segment. He was convinced that the documents were authenticated because he was told in no uncertain terms that this was so. He defended the story over-zealously afterwards; again, he believed in a star associate with whom he had worked often, and to award-winning result. The Panel has found that his unwillingness to consider that CBS News and his colleague were in the wrong was a mistake, and that the broadcast would have benefited from a more direct involvement on Rather's part.

Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken personal responsibility for his part in the broadcast. He voluntarily moved to set a date to step down from the CBS Evening News anchor chair in March of 2005, which will give him more time to concentrate on his reporting for CBS NEWS. After examining the report and thinking about its implications, we believe any further action would not be appropriate.

Poor Dan. Look at how hard he was working. And he's already suffered enough as a result of the story. CBS is covering Dan's @$$. I'd be pretty ticked if I we one of the ones being terminated.

16 posted on 01/10/2005 8:19:16 AM PST by The_Victor (Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin

CBS news is biased and this report will not cure what ails them. I will never believe anything that comes out of CBS news. And, I do include the the other networks in my organizations of un-believeability.


17 posted on 01/10/2005 8:20:27 AM PST by mom-7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Independent news media trying to unseat a sitting President with the use of false documents. I heard that was against the law.


18 posted on 01/10/2005 8:25:41 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

And President Bush and the family of Lt. Col. Killian will be receiving their apologies when???


19 posted on 01/10/2005 8:26:46 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("I am not a conservative because I am successful; I am successful because I am a conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Civil law, not criminal law. The problem is George Bush is a public figure and so Sullivan V NY Times applys, and that makes it very hard to get a conviction.


20 posted on 01/10/2005 8:30:35 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson