Posted on 01/09/2005 4:16:06 PM PST by kristinn
Can't bring myself to watch. My blood pressure would never withstand the upshoot.
I say revoke their citizenship..Send them over there to their brethren,the beheading huns...Susan Sarandon should be the first to go.
Why bother? Given security level of the event, administering a jackboot or two to the richly deserving hindquarters should not present any problem.
These are the losers in America. They had no initiative to excell in life and blame others for their failures. I wish they would put them all on an uninhabitated island and let them fend for themselves. I would sum them up as domestic terrorists all part of the democratic party.
Many people dont seem to realize the fact that the vast majority of the world is socialist; ie the government controls every aspect of life. Even the USA is slipping more towards being a socialist republic on a daily basis.
Its only a matter of time before the true patriots in the land of the free have to make up their mind whether or not to go right along with the rest of the world and become a socialist state. Maybe these protesters will help make up some minds.
I don't think they'll hesitate for a second to give those Commie freaks a 'wood shampoo' the moment any of 'em step out of line.
DC Anti-War Network (DAWN) leaders believe that ANSWER set their 9 am gathering time to keep people from attending DAWN's event at that same time.
An Un-Endorsement of ANSWER Counter-Inaugural includes:
The most offensive part of ANSWERs counter-inaugural announcements is the explicit call for activists NOT to attend the other events. This is absolutely inherent in what ANSWER is saying -- they insist, repeatedly, that protestors must be at ANSWERs event by 9:00am. They stress the importance of 9:00am as an arrival time, they pound it into your head when you read their information on their counter-inaugural announcements. 9:00am -- the very starting time of DAWNs events, a time that was announced well in advance of ANSWERs events. ANSWER planned their event explicitly to conflict with DAWNs events, that is absolutely clear and any attempt to deny this is illogical. The time-frame of 9:00am is important to ANSWER, is the important time to show up, precisely because it is the time they chose as the call to arrive at THEIR events! There is nothing other-worldly about 9:00am, no specific reason for the selection of 9:00am -- except one: to conflict with the other planned counter-inaugural events which ANSWER had no way of co-opting and claiming as their own. If they cannot make a claim of ownership and dominate planning/organizing/carrying out of an event, if they cannot at least manipulate the event or the images that emerge from it, they seem little interested in collaborating and in fact will try to detract from the event. [emphasis added]
Permits Granted includes this post:
Re: Permits Granted. by The Sad Truth
09 Jan 2005 Modified: 10 Jan 2005As many veteran activists know, ANSWER has a long history of organizing competing demonstrations and sabotaging the plans put together by other groups. The answer to this is to support the excellent work being done by grassroots groups such as DAWN and ignore ANSWER's events.
For more info on ANSWER and their history of doing this, see: http://www.infoshop.org/texts/wwp.html
I'm wondering if they want to bring back the 60's protests that that means Bush gets to bring out the machine gun - sand bag bunkers on strategic street corners. Although that was perhaps a "70's thing".
I hope you guys ca/will have some strategically placed video & still cameras on hand to document the treasonous bastages.
I believe he is advocating the overthrow of the government.
Yeah, you're right about that! And I realize people are worried about border issues, particularly 'southern' border issues. And they're right; we do need to be worried about those. However, groups like ANSWER are just as dangerous as any terrorists that could come over the border! The groups like Al Quieda(sp?)and such are here, and we are watching out for them. But we also need to look out for these dangerous 'protest' groups!
I have no doubt that these people are being brought in, and are coming in too, by other ways and means, such as planes, busses, over Canadian border in cars, etc.! They scare me just as much as people that can run drugs over the southern border; and they are scary enough!
That's exactly what I've been wondering! I suspect that this bunch has weapons; but they don't want anyone else to have them. From knowing what this sort of people did in past times; they would do it again, without batting an eyelash! Whether it was a king, or dictator, or a conquerer, they would take others weapons to make them helpless.
But nowadays, most of these people sit back, and let others do their dirty work. They pretend to be in all concern about society, and pretend to be what they're not. They fool a lot of people into going along with them, until it's too late and they are caught!
They carry on about how they are so for peace and brotherhood, and all anti-war, diplomacy, etc. But if they were to ever gain enough power, it makes my head swim to think how quickly they would use war to gain power!
Oh yeah, they claim they are such peaceful people; they're such pacifists! But the 'masks' slip once in awhile, and soon they will drop entirely. Then they'll be far more dangerous and violent than the Bush administration is accused of being!
The people who make up ANSWER would not dream of fighting against a dictator even if they happened to disapprove of him. They think it's safe to fight against, well, a free republic (as it certainly was in 1968, when one of their own was running the Justice Department). I hope that this time they will discover otherwise.
Sure, you have a right to protest. That does not mean people have to see it.
What is the guy on the right doing....?
LOL
Oh, yes, I do think we'll be appreciated!
Buffering; 1% complete
Buffering; 2% complete
Buffering; 3% complete
Buffering; 4% complete
Buffering; 5% complete
Buffering; 6% complete
Buffering; 7% complete
Did you ctach the credits?
Brought to you by Agence France Press.
Pretty good analogy. Funny to watch them savage each other when they step on each other's sensitivities (vanities), which are numerous. It strengthens my resolve to bury them politically and socially whenever I read their garbage.
Outstanding...carry on :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.