Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NewRomeTacitus
"a return to real conservatism "

GW is real conservatism. He's as best as you are ever going to get. He is not his father. He is in fact continuing the Reagan agenda, and doing an excellent job of it.

You must not have been around politically aware during the first Reagan term. You have no idea how much infighting there was between the "we" and "they".

Try imagining if GW had picked McCain as his running mate, then named McCain's campaign chairman to head up his transition team and serve as Chief of Staff. Imagine if the word was sent down that no Christian Right activists need apply for positions in the new administration.

You have no idea how lucky you are to have GW as president. And unless we can keep a large percentage of the Hispanic vote, he may be the last Republican president you'll see in your lifetime.

81 posted on 01/09/2005 4:25:23 PM PST by bayourod (The states and cities with large immigrant labor pools are the prosperous ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: bayourod
GW is real conservatism.

No he's not, he defines convenientism more than anything. His relationships with Mexican elitists holding outstanding influence in that country has been well documented. Never mind that some of his former business partners are now on Most Wanted lists.

My problem with the President of the the United States lies in my belief that the law should applied to everyone equally. I've seen illegal aliens recieve exceptions and special considerations Americans wouldn't get. That's flat-out wrong. He constantly says that family values don't stop at the Rio Grande. What he really seems to be proposing is a twisted form of racism against the caucasions who carried democracy to this point of time for the sake of a select group of profiteers.

I'd love to be wrong on that and my belief that powerful forces are edging us to a world government. It's happening now and we have to fight for our founders vision. Where are you on that one? I say that the Rule of Law doesn't stop for any Party's convenience. You can try to change the law to favor the hypercaptalists trying to hoard all real financial resources while continued existance requires continual movement of the financial stream. Without that movement wealth becomes meaningless as all of society suffers. In short, no one will ever be on top of the hill, only the last up there to die of deprivation.

86 posted on 01/09/2005 6:32:25 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: bayourod
And unless we can keep a large percentage of the Hispanic vote, he may be the last Republican president you'll see in your lifetime.

In a poll in a recent issue of the Hispanic Poder magazine, a majority of readers came out in favor of tighter enforcement of immigration laws.

100 posted on 01/10/2005 10:19:11 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson