To: Harmless Teddy Bear
not bad. thanks.
empiricism suggests that a test be run using top-of-the-line equipment locked in a sound-proofed room which is also a full farraday cage, then subject the recording to digital analysis for pattern and modulation.
34 posted on
01/08/2005 10:34:05 PM PST by
King Prout
(Halloween... not just for breakfast anymore.)
To: King Prout
empiricism suggests that a test be run using top-of-the-line equipment locked in a sound-proofed room which is also a full farraday cage, then subject the recording to digital analysis for pattern and modulation.
Awww, you are taking all the fun out of it. Don't you know you have to BELIEVE!
42 posted on
01/09/2005 6:18:05 AM PST by
Talking_Mouse
(Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
To: King Prout
empiricism suggests that a test be run using top-of-the-line equipment locked in a sound-proofed room which is also a full farraday cage, then subject the recording to digital analysis for pattern and modulation. That would work well I think. It certainly would clear out most if not all of the natural phenomena.
43 posted on
01/09/2005 7:36:21 AM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum (V minus 6 and counting))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson