Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey; SheLion; Mears; All

As the article stated, over 13% of flights had concentrations over 1000ppm for the entire flight.

That also does not include time taxiing, or sitting on the runway, which can be lengthy.

If you want to pick and choose information that the CONCLUSION of the article has already examined and discarded as irrelevant, feel free.

Now for the third and last time, don't post to me anymore. I've wasted enough time with a closed-minded agenda-driven poster who doesn't bother to read before posting. I should have realized that replying to you is like feeding a mangy stray--the dang thing will NEVER leave. I said you were wrong with my initial post to you, I proved you were wrong with my link in 390, and your method of picking and choosing which information you will USE is extremely boring, like a child that continually says "Why?"

Goodbye.


441 posted on 01/08/2005 6:39:21 PM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne
Now for the third and last time, don't post to me anymore. I've wasted enough time with a closed-minded agenda-driven poster who doesn't bother to read before posting.

I read your link. As noted earlier, I missed your post but asked which link you were referring to and I went and read it. It recommends increasing to 7 l/s per passenger. Many planes already meet that standard; some are marginally lower. They say that for long distance flights, most of the time the CO2 is between 500 to 800 ppm which is acceptable. The report sets off no alarm bells nor gives any dire statistics.

You have repeatedly stated that I am wrong but not once have you made a specific reference to a statement that I made that is in error.

442 posted on 01/08/2005 6:44:57 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

To: Judith Anne
I said you were wrong with my initial post to you, I proved you were wrong with my link in 390,

Where was I wrong? You made a link but you failed to cite the statement I made that was in error. I found nothing in your link that contradicts my allegation that the author of the story lied.

444 posted on 01/08/2005 6:47:58 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

To: Judith Anne

Here is the author's claim which I said was a lie:

"It should also be noted that since the ban, they no longer use fresh air to ventilate the planes; instead, they just run the air through a filtrations system which in an enclosed environment further exacerbates the problem."

Now where in your link does it show that airlines NO longer use fresh air? In fact your link shows that they DO use fresh air and it only recommends increasing the amount of fresh air slightly.


445 posted on 01/08/2005 6:50:00 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

To: Judith Anne

I think Wild Turkey gets a high from aggravating and arguing.

Why on earth he/she is posting here is beyond me.



446 posted on 01/08/2005 6:50:39 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

To: Judith Anne
Now for the third and last time, don't post to me anymore

He was like this before he changed his name. He gets his teeth into you you can't shake him loose. It's a very unintelligent boring game he tries to play with us.

He puts me in mind of a very lonely person that needs to be noticed. And he latches onto someone and won't let go. Just to have someone to talk to.

455 posted on 01/08/2005 8:28:40 PM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson