Posted on 01/08/2005 7:02:35 AM PST by NYer
EdReform, please see my post #377; it may interest you.
WRONG. They are in school to LEARN READING, WRITING AND ARITHMETIC, not to be PSYCHOLOGICALLY MANIPULATED.
In March 1984 a remarkable real-life drama took place in seven American cities as hundreds of parents from all over the U.S. attended Hearings on the proposed 'Protection of Pupils' Rights Amendment'. Thirteen hundred pages of testimony were recorded from parents, public school teachers and citizens, giving eyewitness account of the psychological abuse of children in public schools......
The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232h; 34 CFR Part 98) applies to programs that receive funding from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). PPRA is intended to protect the rights of parents and students in two ways:Link to other documents at the US Department of Education (Search term used = PUPIL RIGHTS* It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors make instructional materials available for inspection by parents if those materials will be used in connection with an ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation in which their children participate; and
* It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors obtain written parental consent before minor students are required to participate in any ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning:
1. Political affiliations;Parents or students who believe their rights under PPRA may have been violated may file a complaint with ED by writing the Family Policy Compliance Office. Complaints must contain specific allegations of fact giving reasonable cause to believe that a violation of PPRA occurred.
2. Mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to the student and his/her family;
3. Sex behavior and attitudes;
4. Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior;
5. Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
6. Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers; or
7. Income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program).
For additional information or technical assistance, you may call (202) 260-3887 (voice). Individuals who use TDD may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339. Or you may contact us at the following address:
Family Policy Compliance Office
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20202-5901
BTTT
...a confederacy of deceivers that, to obtain dominion over men in this present world, endeavour, by dark and erroneous doctrines, to extinguish in them the light, both of nature and of the gospel; and so to disprepare them for the kingdom of God to come.
Exactly right, Sir Francis. But, Judgment shall come upon them all.
So then there are some squirrels you find sexy?
But no science or history or literature or art? Can you think outside of stupid cliches?
Can you? You post sarcastically to anything not "in your box."
What's so cliche about not supposed to be psychologically manipulating children? Or do you just NOT UNDERSTAND? You prefer to "be right" come hell or high water, just because of ego.
Well, well, well. I hope FedEx can do without my company's business. I had already called a client and told them not to ship any documents to our office ever again after we had some problems with a couple of their delivery guys being rude and incompetent. I followed that up with a ban on all employees from using FedEx on outgoing services.
Quite a leap there from sharing and encouraging sexual fetishes.
Except that society has ridiculed those who WOULD offer to help homosexuals change/cope. Instead we are being told through such "sexual identity" conditioning that "it's alright" and such an "alternative" lifestyle should be presented to small children as normal and even encouraged if they are so inclined.
Sorry, Blurbblogger, but I don't fool so easy.
Take the tripe to the tourists.
Fallwell is a grade-A, 100% nutcase-- the Al Sharpton of the right-- who just happens to share a few of your own prejudices (against gays) so you feel the need to defend him. Don't-- it doesn't speak well for your credibility.
Wasn't it Fallwell who spoke after the Sept. 11 attacks, blaming what he views as society's ills for the attacks, as if God were punishing us as He did Sodom and Gomorrah?
What a sick, disgusting bit of moral equivalency, more befitting a crazed leftist like Noam Chomsky than a so-called conservative.
Wasn't it Fallwell who waged an expensive, personal vendetta against Larry Flynt (another jerk) in Court over nothing more than a satirical attack comic Flynt had run in Hustler? Nothing less than the SCOTUS had to rule in favor of parody and the right to free speech in America (hence against Fallwell's attempted censorship). Talk about dodging a bullet; if Fallwell had prevailed, FR would have gone under years ago from the deluge of legal bills caused by the lawsuits of outraged, mocked lefties.
A hero? No thank you. Not to the Constitution, not to patriotism, and not to me.
You can buy into the revisionist history that was used to slam Jerry Fallwell if you want, but the media outed Tinky Winky YEARS before Mr. Fallwell did:
http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/teletubbies.html
Attack the man if you want but at least understand when the liberal media is deliberately pulling their Soviet-style tricks.
Embracing the desire to wear a dress or take horomone shots and cut your genitalia off is WRONG.
Confronting that desire and moving BEYOND it is what should be done (and is not through such an indoctrination program).
Drunkards can be fired (even if they only show up with a hangover or maybe make a public ass of themselves at parties) and have the state take their kids away for neglect. They are not permitted to "live free and be who they want to be".
Just one step along the way in the overall plan to normalize pedophilia so that they can have sexual access to our children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.