Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRO - Kerry Spot - RATHER REPORT COMING OUT FRIDAY?
National Review Online ^ | January 5, 2005

Posted on 01/07/2005 7:54:03 PM PST by NCjim

My little bird that is familiar with discussions within CBS News tells me that the long, long, long-awaited report on the infamous CBS memo by former U.S. Attorney General Richard Thornburgh and retired A.P. president Louis Boccardi may be coming out Friday.

Hmmm... would this be a Friday at 5 pm release?

Also, you'll recall this little birdie told me that CBS was considering naming Rather's replacement the same day they release the report.

UPDATE: Scylla & Charybdis adds speculation that also points to Friday:

The MSM has geared up to run Abu Ghraib-type headlines over the Alberto R. Gonzales nomination hearings. See, e.g., today's LA Times and NY Times. The hearings begin Thursday.

Not a stretch to smell this coming: CBS will "release" the Thornburgh report this Friday, right into the cacophony of MSM "news" about the nefarious Alberto Gonzales. The MSM "Gonzales story" will detract attention on Friday, from the paucity of details in the release of the Thornburgh Report.

Note: As previously explained at this blog, the "release" will be not much more than a press release stating that CBS management has taken "internal measures deemed appropriate to ensure.... blah blah blah," with perhaps one example being made public.

We're a cynical bunch, aren't we?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rathergate; ratherreport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Any hints anywhere else on the Rather report?
1 posted on 01/07/2005 7:54:03 PM PST by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NCjim


I think Powerline had the same comment yesterday.


2 posted on 01/07/2005 7:56:41 PM PST by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I take it that nothing came out today???


3 posted on 01/07/2005 7:58:54 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Will there be any mention of legal proceedings against Rather for his obvious fraud in this matter?


4 posted on 01/07/2005 7:59:54 PM PST by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091

Figures.


5 posted on 01/07/2005 8:00:35 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NCjim


Well, it is Friday-10:00 PM cst and I haven't seen the report, have you seen the report--- I also haven't seen the photos of ABU GHRAIB at the Gonzalez hearing--

Is this article predicting NEXT Friday?


6 posted on 01/07/2005 8:00:46 PM PST by Txsleuth (Proud to be a Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Tomorrow morning at 3AM is my guess.


7 posted on 01/07/2005 8:01:36 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

The Whitewash can't come out soon enough for

'dnC'BS

I just wish I knew a few aggressive shareholders to file Sarbanes Oxley complaints against them, and also to press for a shareholder lawsuit against Rather and Hayward...

Re-Designed ANTI-DNC Web Portal at --->
http://www.noDNC.com


8 posted on 01/07/2005 8:02:25 PM PST by woodb01 (Re-Designed ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

It predicted today which is almost over - hence my query.


9 posted on 01/07/2005 8:02:48 PM PST by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Their going to verify the documents were authentic. It really was Dan's type writer after all!


10 posted on 01/07/2005 8:03:45 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Is it Friday yet?

I also recall that it was going to be released on December 10th.


11 posted on 01/07/2005 8:04:34 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Whenever they do this it will be at a time calculated to have
minimum impact.


12 posted on 01/07/2005 8:05:01 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
I'm not sure, but I think I heard on the news a day or so ago that some media group or magazine or something came out and said that since it was not "proven" that the documents were fake, then you couldn't assign wrong doing on Rather.

The news said that just because they might be forged, that doesn't mean they weren't accurate, even though they acknowledged that the language and other elements of notes didn't match the lingo of the time and service.

Go figure, all I know is , just like all celebs and athletes there will be no real repercussions.
13 posted on 01/07/2005 8:09:02 PM PST by Txsleuth (Proud to be a Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Here is the summation.
1) Rather is an innocent double dumba$$
2) The documents were forged but accurate
3)Mary Mapes exercised good judgment inappropriately.
14 posted on 01/07/2005 8:13:49 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Black Dogs are my life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
In memory of Rather

15 posted on 01/07/2005 8:35:44 PM PST by ProudVet77 (Let the games begin - It's Friday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

It's the serious of the charges, not that their falseness/phoniness that is important. Yuk


16 posted on 01/07/2005 8:54:58 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
They must be producing the report on a 1970s era IBM Selectric typewriter -- that must be the reason for the delay. It's all the th superscripts that are necessary in the exhibits that's slowing down the process.

-PJ

17 posted on 01/07/2005 8:57:41 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
Is it Friday yet?

May they take all the time they want. It can only hurt CBS.  Apparently, their affiliates are going crazy, and still reeling from their viewers' outrage. Or so is the impression I get from Al Thompkins' column on Poynter Online:

CBS affiliates are anxious to hear what the internal investigation by Dick Thornburgh and Louis Boccardi reveals. In some ways, they say, more than the network's reputation is at stake. The local stations have taken a lot of heat over this issue as well.

"I will put it this way, very simply I want the truth," KHOU-TV Houston President and General Manager Peter Diaz told Poynter Online. "We need to know how the system broke down at CBS."

[ . . . ]

[ former CBS affiliates Board Chairman Bob ] Lee said the report about the investigation will be critical to restoring the public's trust in CBS News and to all network news coverage. "People did not like what they were hearing. The public puts an extraordinary trust in those who are permitted to come in to their home each night with their daily news. It was like people really thought they were scammed on this one; that they were given a concocted story. They were asking 'If I can't believe this what else can I not believe?'"


18 posted on 01/07/2005 9:35:06 PM PST by Racehorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Don't hold your breath, Mr. Investigator. I'll tell you what broke down - you've got two generations of hard-left reporters stuffed in that newsroom, and they couldn't wait to take down the President, truth be damned.

The sooner you admit that, the better you'll feel.


19 posted on 01/07/2005 10:24:07 PM PST by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MIT-Elephant
I'll tell you what broke down - you've got two generations of hard-left reporters stuffed in that newsroom, and they couldn't wait to take down the President, truth be damned.

Spot on, MIT. You hit the nail on the head.

20 posted on 01/08/2005 2:05:23 AM PST by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson