To: GovernmentShrinker
I just don't want to hear any wild tales that it's unconstitutional to do so even WITH a court proceeding.The gun-fundamentalists will surely bleat, "What part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?"
And it is that very attitude which has enabled the gun-control advocates to marginalize firearms rights in the minds of the public.
109 posted on
01/07/2005 2:09:35 PM PST by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: Chemist_Geek
What part of "due process" do you not understand?
110 posted on
01/07/2005 2:14:24 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Chemist_Geek
Let me ask you this: Does a person lose his right to speak forever after being convicted of slander? If a person yelled "FIRE!" in a crowded theather and caused a panic where people were killed, is that person barred from becoming a writer? Is that person barred from partaking in their own defense or can they be compelled to give witness against themselves?
The Second Amendment is just as important and valid as the First.
187 posted on
01/07/2005 7:28:10 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Chemist_Geek
The gun-fundamentalists will surely bleat, "What part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?"Your anti-gun streak is showing. Aren't you the one who claimed that some federal gun laws are constitutional?
220 posted on
01/08/2005 10:25:40 AM PST by
jmc813
(J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson