Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reservists May Face Longer Tours of Duty
Washington Post ^ | January 7, 2005 | Bradley Graham

Posted on 01/06/2005 9:30:48 PM PST by Former Military Chick

Army leaders are considering seeking a change in Pentagon policy that would allow for longer and more frequent call-ups of some reservists to meet the demands of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, a senior Army official said yesterday.

Reservists are being used heavily to fill key military support jobs, particularly in specialty areas, but Army authorities are having increasing difficulty limiting the active-duty time of some normally part-time soldiers to a set maximum of two years, the official said. He described the National Guard's 15 main combat units as close to being "tapped out."

To avoid pushing reserve forces to the breaking point, the official also said, a temporary increase of 30,000 troops in active-duty ranks that was authorized last year will probably need to be made permanent, especially if U.S. troop levels in Iraq remain high. He said significant troop levels may be required in Iraq for four or five more years.

The official declined to be named because of the political sensitivity of the troop issue and the lack of decisions. But he said that the Army probably will ask Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld in the next several months to change the policy on mobilization of reservists. "It's coming," he told a small group of Pentagon reporters. "I think we're going to have this discussion this spring."

The news comes as the Bush administration confronts rising controversy over the shape and size of the U.S. military, particularly whether the active-duty and reserve forces are robust enough to meet the many demands placed upon them. Soldiers and their families are also expressing frustration at repeat deployments to Iraq and tours of duty that have already been extended.

About 40 percent of the 150,000 troops now in Iraq have come from reserve ranks.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oif; oif2; reservists; rotation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2005 9:30:49 PM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The official declined to be named

When one of these dudes speaks on the record, then I'll start considering the validity.

2 posted on 01/06/2005 9:34:28 PM PST by No Longer Free State (If integrity does not reside in the captain of the ship, then it is not on board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

"When one of these dudes speaks on the record, then I'll start considering the validity"

Wake up!!! Everyone else has been extended!! If they don't extend the reservists, I would be very surprised!! The Dems backed George in a corner during the election. Just like the George the first, No new taxes, George the second, No Draft!

I would rather have a draft and get some of our Street Gangs employed. They like to ambush people, nows their chance!


3 posted on 01/06/2005 9:50:17 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Just what we need. Gangsters with military training.


4 posted on 01/06/2005 10:02:35 PM PST by No Longer Free State (If integrity does not reside in the captain of the ship, then it is not on board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"I think we're going to have this discussion this spring."

They should be having this discussion right now. Did the Bush admin ever increase active duty and reserve military quota's from the reduced levels of the clintoon admin??

I suspect one of GW Bush's stupidest moves may turn out to be his proclamation of no military draft while he's president. Does anyone believe the US can actually defeat 1 billion blood-crazed, demonic, psychopathic muslims on the cheap with a repeatedly re-deployed force of 130,000 marine/army troopers? If out of a population of 260M we can muster a volunteer force of only 200,000, we need the military draft.

5 posted on 01/06/2005 10:46:41 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

Yea, but you see, having spent 21 years in the military and having been a Drill Instructor, I can gurantee you that they may go into bootcamp as little Gangsters, but I assure you they come out Americans. Very good Citizens in fact, because they no longer have their heads up their backsides!!


6 posted on 01/06/2005 10:48:37 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

We used a draft for WWII.

I was drafted and served honorably during Vietnam. I worked in military personnel management, and do NOT recall draftees being any more or less difficult, than volunteer enlistees.

It appears the relatively small size of our military is resulting in extensions, for regulars and reserves. This may, in turn, be making service less attractive.

Or maybe we need to pay the military people at a high enough rate, that the supply is high enough to avoid the draft?


7 posted on 01/06/2005 11:04:28 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Just curious. Does the military have procedures for removing the real antisocial psychopath type?

It's a scary thought that we could train antisocial criminals the arts of efficient killing.


8 posted on 01/06/2005 11:25:18 PM PST by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kimosabe31
we need the military draft.

While there are many fine examples of young Americans today, would you put your life in the hands of some random 19 year old draftee? Would you trust them to cover you and/or risk their lives for you on some street or in some building in one of the terrorist strongholds in Iraq, knowing that they maybe against the war, or more concerned about themselves than their unit?

I went into the military just as the draft was being done away with, and most I knew back then were glad. It's not to say that all draftees are bad - they certainly aren't, as the many wars that we've had have proven.
9 posted on 01/07/2005 6:44:37 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
"I would rather have a draft and get some of our Street Gangs employed."

Agree however, I'd add politicians sons. Jeb's son looks pretty healthy don't you think?

10 posted on 01/07/2005 7:09:59 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Or maybe we need to pay the military people at a high enough rate, that the supply is high enough to avoid the draft?

Now we get into cost/benefit analysis. At what point does a draft become cheaper? At what point does the military become a gang of mercenaries? At what point do we decide it's cheaper to hire soldiers from India or other impovershed nations?

11 posted on 01/07/2005 7:19:17 AM PST by 1LongTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
would you put your life in the hands of some random 19 year old draftee?

My father-in-law did in Normandy.

12 posted on 01/07/2005 7:19:58 AM PST by 1LongTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy
Just curious. Does the military have procedures for removing the real antisocial psychopath type?

Yes. They are administratively discharged as unfit for military service. Happens all the time.

13 posted on 01/07/2005 7:22:26 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Reserve recruiters are doomed.


14 posted on 01/07/2005 7:22:40 AM PST by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Or maybe we need to pay the military people at a high enough rate, that the supply is high enough to avoid the draft?

How high would you like to go? Let's take for a moment a 20 year old Army Private, E-3, married, in Iraq with a paratroop unit. His base pay is $1641, his housing allowance is $504, he gets $250 per month separation pay and $150 a month in jump pay. Total is $2545 per month or over $30,000 per year. Not bad for a 20 or 21 year old out of high school.

God knows my point is not to begrudge the troops the pay that they get. They earn every dime and more. But money is not the answer. I would be amazed if you can find more than a handful that enlisted for the money, and most military people I served with would be highly insulted if people thought that they were in it for the bucks. People join for reasons not remotely related to salary, and thinking that if you can only increase the salaries to a certain level and that'll get you all the troops you need will probably do nothing but get you people enlisting for the wrong reasons.

15 posted on 01/07/2005 7:35:40 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy

Yes, we the Drill Instructors are trained to be Drill instructors. The pressures of Bootcamp are challenging both physically and mentally. These challenges bring outthe good and the bad, makes a person look at themselves. Evaluate themselves, and how they will handle that presure. Those demands are usually basic int nature but we understand it as HARD LOVE!

It's amazing how after just 9 weeks, the metmophasis is complete or nearly complete. Usually it doesn't take this long. ALlof the failures of the schools come out also. Many can't read, they go thru remedial reading,same with math. Many personalities are weeded out, not just discharged either. Some are, with recommendations for further medical/psyc treatment. They are identified.

Bootcamp is for everyone, Marine Bootcamp is the toughest.If you make it through any of the MIlitary bootcamps, you have gained a tremendous amount in self esteem and character building and Patriotism! This is why I believe the Draft should be brought back. It gives the person a sense of direction and confidence. A 2 year hitch is fine, Long enough to find yourseld and get your feet on the ground and short enough that it doesn't feel like a life time.


16 posted on 01/07/2005 7:56:51 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
I would rather have a draft

I don't think that is too far away either.

17 posted on 01/07/2005 8:00:19 AM PST by insider_uk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
"Reserve recruiters are doomed."

LOL, very funny!

18 posted on 01/07/2005 8:07:26 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Bump, very true, Marine Corp Boot Camp was the best thing that ever happened to me, even thought at the time I thought I had died and gone to hell.


19 posted on 01/07/2005 8:11:05 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

No Exemptions?? Fine with me! There are no exemptions if you join the reserves only for ROTC after they have contracted with the Army. My son is going through this now.

He joined the reserves because he wanted, He wanted to complete Enlisted Boot camp. This is not a requirement for ROTC. He wanted to prove to himself that Enlisted Bootcamp was OK. It was, but he was in excellent physical condition.
He returned from Bootcamp and went on a ROTC unit exercise. During the exercise he broke his arm. Hasn't contracted for ROTC yet, but should in the next few weeks. Arm prevented him from being deployed to Iraq. He was pretty upset about not being able to go.He's back in College now.


20 posted on 01/07/2005 8:21:31 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson