Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I think this is a clear indication that we are winning!
1 posted on 01/06/2005 6:41:54 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

It also means the Fallujah operation scared the jabber out of them. :-)


2 posted on 01/06/2005 6:43:11 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Maybe Terror Central had a large component in Aceh.


3 posted on 01/06/2005 6:43:12 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

"Ridge offered no single explanation for the drop, saying it could be stepped-up U.S. efforts to boost security, increase military action, disrupt terrorist leaders and their finances or, simply, the "hardening of America.""

They drowned in the tsunami. Our God drowned them. HA!


4 posted on 01/06/2005 6:44:28 PM PST by RtWngr (Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Hopefully, you're correct. But it could ALSO mean they've moved to more secure means of communications. . .


5 posted on 01/06/2005 6:45:43 PM PST by Salgak (don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I forget, what happened this time a year ago, that the Terrorists were all a twitter about?

I mean besides us taking Iraq?

What were they planning... I can't remember much except the
Spain bombing.

Were they playing us then, or are they playing us now?
Where's my tinfoil hat?....


6 posted on 01/06/2005 6:45:54 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Hearing this it makes me think of "THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM".

Always vigilant, Always prepared, and Always Faithful!!

7 posted on 01/06/2005 6:46:47 PM PST by PISANO (The MSM's MOTTO: "Whatever it is..if it's bad.....it's GW's fault!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
A variety of factors could be contributing to the lull, Ridge said

Dead men may vote, but they tend not to chatter.

8 posted on 01/06/2005 6:46:58 PM PST by dirtboy (To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Wasn't there a claim that the amount of chatter decreased just before 9/11?


9 posted on 01/06/2005 6:48:11 PM PST by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; JustPiper; Velveeta; all4one; flutters; MamaDearest; KylaStarr; Rushmore Rocks; ...

PING


10 posted on 01/06/2005 6:49:19 PM PST by WestCoastGal ("If you can't run with the big dogs, you'd better go sit on the porch." (Daytona 500 45 days);-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; admin
Look like you beat me by three minutes!!!!!  I did a search, really!!!!!

U.S. sees lull in terror threat "chatter," Ridge says
  Posted by Phsstpok
On News/Activism 01/06/2005 8:45:52 PM CST

Admin Mod - can you consolidate these threads?  I don't care which is which.  It's the same article.  My only contribution is the link to an earlier thread on the same subject.

11 posted on 01/06/2005 6:49:39 PM PST by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
A variety of factors could be contributing to the lull, Ridge said, and he warned that terrorists "are strategic actors and long-range planners" who could be merely lying low before striking again.

Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!

13 posted on 01/06/2005 6:51:14 PM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Maybe instead of just listening to them "chatter" we have actually started shooting them instead.


14 posted on 01/06/2005 6:51:44 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

They are getting the message that mass murder does not pay.


16 posted on 01/06/2005 6:52:16 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I think this means they are done with the planning stages, now they are going into operation mode.

This does NOT make me feel safer.


18 posted on 01/06/2005 6:54:54 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
the Soviets transmit 24/7/365 on their most important channels/frequencies so we can never see patterns or spikes in their transmissions or watch alerts go up and down their fire chains or go secure radio silent before an event.

they x-mit junk whenever it's not being used to send flash traffic just to keep the lines busy.

19 posted on 01/06/2005 6:54:54 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Well, keep in mind, they typically get quiet suddenly just prior to an attack.

However, the sudden quietness follows a period of really intense "chatter," which I do not believe was occurring prior to this quieting down.

Therefore, I think it is more likely this is GOOD news....that they are giving up for now to lay low for awhile.

However, I am not a CIA analyst, so what the heck do I know.


23 posted on 01/06/2005 7:10:00 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I wouldn't get too excited, just yet. Unfortunately, these weasels are resilient and still have supporters.

I'm not reading too much into it, personally.


24 posted on 01/06/2005 7:10:10 PM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
....saying it could be stepped-up U.S. efforts to boost security, increase military action, disrupt terrorist leaders and their finances or, simply, the "hardening of America."

And the reelection of President Bush......

26 posted on 01/06/2005 7:17:28 PM PST by capydick ("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." --President Dwight Eisenho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Could be any of those and none of those," he said. "I suspect it's probably all of them."

Okay....

27 posted on 01/06/2005 7:25:04 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I think we are winning, but the lull in the chatter may not be as a result of that.

I recall reading, that in July 2001 they had a lot of chatter, than it all died down, then we had the attack in September.

I think the lull may just be to throw us off the track.

Stay vigilant.


30 posted on 01/06/2005 8:04:35 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson