I think this is a clear indication that we are winning!
1 posted on
01/06/2005 6:41:54 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
It also means the Fallujah operation scared the jabber out of them. :-)
2 posted on
01/06/2005 6:43:11 PM PST by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: wagglebee
Maybe Terror Central had a large component in Aceh.
To: wagglebee
"Ridge offered no single explanation for the drop, saying it could be stepped-up U.S. efforts to boost security, increase military action, disrupt terrorist leaders and their finances or, simply, the "hardening of America.""
They drowned in the tsunami. Our God drowned them. HA!
4 posted on
01/06/2005 6:44:28 PM PST by
RtWngr
(Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
To: wagglebee
Hopefully, you're correct. But it could ALSO mean they've moved to more secure means of communications. . .
5 posted on
01/06/2005 6:45:43 PM PST by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
To: wagglebee
I forget, what happened this time a year ago, that the Terrorists were all a twitter about?
I mean besides us taking Iraq?
What were they planning... I can't remember much except the
Spain bombing.
Were they playing us then, or are they playing us now?
Where's my tinfoil hat?....
6 posted on
01/06/2005 6:45:54 PM PST by
konaice
To: wagglebee
Hearing this it makes me think of "THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM".
Always vigilant, Always prepared, and Always Faithful!!
7 posted on
01/06/2005 6:46:47 PM PST by
PISANO
(The MSM's MOTTO: "Whatever it is..if it's bad.....it's GW's fault!!")
To: wagglebee
A variety of factors could be contributing to the lull, Ridge saidDead men may vote, but they tend not to chatter.
8 posted on
01/06/2005 6:46:58 PM PST by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: wagglebee
Wasn't there a claim that the amount of chatter decreased just before 9/11?
To: wagglebee; JustPiper; Velveeta; all4one; flutters; MamaDearest; KylaStarr; Rushmore Rocks; ...
10 posted on
01/06/2005 6:49:19 PM PST by
WestCoastGal
("If you can't run with the big dogs, you'd better go sit on the porch." (Daytona 500 45 days);-)
To: wagglebee; admin
11 posted on
01/06/2005 6:49:39 PM PST by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: wagglebee
A variety of factors could be contributing to the lull, Ridge said, and he warned that terrorists "are strategic actors and long-range planners" who could be merely lying low before striking again.Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!
13 posted on
01/06/2005 6:51:14 PM PST by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: wagglebee
Maybe instead of just listening to them "chatter" we have actually started shooting them instead.
14 posted on
01/06/2005 6:51:44 PM PST by
KoRn
To: wagglebee
They are getting the message that mass murder does not pay.
To: wagglebee
I think this means they are done with the planning stages, now they are going into operation mode.
This does NOT make me feel safer.
18 posted on
01/06/2005 6:54:54 PM PST by
sandbar
To: wagglebee
![](http://www.scifi.com/tripping/characters/chode/images/chode.gif)
the Soviets transmit 24/7/365 on their most important channels/frequencies so we can never see patterns or spikes in their transmissions or watch alerts go up and down their fire chains or go secure radio silent before an event.
they x-mit junk whenever it's not being used to send flash traffic just to keep the lines busy.
19 posted on
01/06/2005 6:54:54 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: wagglebee
Well, keep in mind, they typically get quiet suddenly just prior to an attack.
However, the sudden quietness follows a period of really intense "chatter," which I do not believe was occurring prior to this quieting down.
Therefore, I think it is more likely this is GOOD news....that they are giving up for now to lay low for awhile.
However, I am not a CIA analyst, so what the heck do I know.
23 posted on
01/06/2005 7:10:00 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: wagglebee
I wouldn't get too excited, just yet. Unfortunately, these weasels are resilient and still have supporters.
I'm not reading too much into it, personally.
24 posted on
01/06/2005 7:10:10 PM PST by
exnavychick
(There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart.)
To: wagglebee
....saying it could be stepped-up U.S. efforts to boost security, increase military action, disrupt terrorist leaders and their finances or, simply, the "hardening of America." And the reelection of President Bush......
26 posted on
01/06/2005 7:17:28 PM PST by
capydick
("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." --President Dwight Eisenho)
To: wagglebee
Could be any of those and none of those," he said. "I suspect it's probably all of them."Okay....
To: wagglebee
I think we are winning, but the lull in the chatter may not be as a result of that.
I recall reading, that in July 2001 they had a lot of chatter, than it all died down, then we had the attack in September.
I think the lull may just be to throw us off the track.
Stay vigilant.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson