Yes, I suppose we will have to disagree. We have a totally different take on what the evidence was. :)
I do want to clarify something, though. I never meant to imply that she should have come forward strictly for the money. Whether or not she did is a question only she can answer, but I don't believe that she did.
Been nice talking to you!
And the rest of us spectators certainly enjoyed the chick-fight!
This is one of the fabulous parts of Free Republic you can exchange thoughts with for the most part like minded folks. If we all agreed all the time it would be a very boring world.
I have just gotten tired of our justice system in the years after OJ. The idea that there are folks that seem to think that it is their right to profit from their time serving as a juror bugs me. We are a country of the all mighty buck.
When they passed the law years ago that disallowed those who were convicted of crimes to be unable to profit from their crimes was a terrific law, but, it has been over turned. Who knows maybe others will find it *moraly* wrong.
Just the opinion of chick in the heartland.