Posted on 01/06/2005 2:54:25 PM PST by gina girl
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/6/153719.shtml
You can make a great viewing list of directors who never won a competitive Oscar. Hawks, Lubitsch, Sternberg, Stroheim, Hitchcock, Ray, Welles, Kubrick.
I am not angry at you, I just don't agree with your assesment that anything is art or drama. It is sad that Hwood only wants to tear down not uplift people.
You had me until I got to Kubrick
Good for your sister. And I think you're right, the movie is to good to be cheapened by this Hollywood crowd or their so-called award.
"The Last Temptation of Christ" was not a blockbuster, either. To have recognized schlock like "The Ten Commandments" but now to ignore Gibson's film is telling.
I don't follow your post. Until 'I' got to Kubrick you mean? I take it you don't feel he was ever deserving. See 'Paths of Glory' man!
Aaw come on the Ten Commandments is so much fun! To make a film that's almost 4 hours long and not boring for a moment is an achievement. And Demille was just as sincere in his intentions with the film as Gibson was. He was actively trying to make a film for the ages.
Such films reflect the nihilism that seems to be the dominant attitude in Hollywood.
nihilism....I was drawing a blank...thanks.
"The Prince of Egypt" tells the story better. And as a biblical epic, I prefer "Samson and Delilah." Hedy was much too old for the role, but Victor Mature was surprisingly touching in his blindness.
I agree. This movie was not made for Hollywood, it was made in spite of Hollywood. The effect Mel Gibson's movie had on people was his reward.
bump
I didn't see the other two, but nobody in "The Manchurian Candidate" gave a oscar worthy perfomance. I was disappointed in this movie as it wasn't in the same league as the original. All of the plot changes cheapend the movie and Meryl Streep (sp?) paled in comparison to the incredible performance Angela Lansbury gave in the original. All in all, it was a remake that never should have been remade.
You mean it's an unreasonable complaint, but you didn't wish to state it so reasonably? as it were. You have a problem with people expressing outrage at the media elites for failing to recognize one of the best produced and most influential motion pictures of the last however many years, in Gibson's The Passion of Christ? Just as a film, it's a cut above many of the other nominees. Clearly something else is at work, here. And the obvious suspicion is that there is a Catholophobic bias among these same media elites. They are BLACKLISTING this film, denying it any opportunity for recognition. They are shunning the film because of its content, not that it was bloody, but that it was a film reasonably faithful to the Passion story, and Jesus Christ.
It is something about which one OUGHT to be outraged. It's religious discrimination in its worst form, and imposed in conspiratorial fashion by not one, or two, but various individuals and supposedly professional organizations. Wake up. Take off the blinders. Exit the matrix.
The tragedy is that some of the biggest fans of these organizations, from the Oscars on down, are found even here on FR. They contribute to this system, to this blacklisting, by their own enthusiasm for the sham of awards. What is called for, instead, is that 'freepers' shun the Oscars, and the Golden Globes, and that others do, as well. They won't 'get the message'. These BLACKLISTERS will bankrupt their own industry before they confess their own bigotry or do anything positive to remove it; just like liberal newspapers would rather shut their doors than give a conservative columnist even a single inch of print to tell the other side of the story. But even if the media elite will refuse to learn, it's they who should be shunned. And too many on FR will not understand that.
It's been brought up here by someone that if Gibson were to take his proposal for his film to the Vatican it would have been rejected since his view does not match the one currently held by the Catholic church. Sometimes it isn't a wide conspiracy but merely people with different taste.
Amen, and praise God. Blessings upon your sister and all of yours.
Paths of Glory is less then 90 minutes long! As for EWS, every great artist does something substandard. His best films...Dr. Strangelove...are awesome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.