Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple sues popular Mac Web site
Reuters ^ | Thu Jan 6, 2005 | Duncan Martell

Posted on 01/06/2005 2:48:26 PM PST by nickcarraway

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Apple Computer has sued a popular Macintosh rumour Web site for allegedly distributing trade secrets, the latest in a string of lawsuits the company has filed to stop Internet leaks of details of upcoming products.

The latest suit also lends credibility to recent rumours about a Macintosh computer without a display and an office productivity software suite that surfaced in the run-up to Apple's annual trade show held here next week, where CEO Steve Jobs typically unveils new products.

Apple, in the complaint filed on Tuesday, sued Web site Think Secret and other unnamed individuals, claiming that Think Secret had induced these individuals to breach confidentiality agreements that they had signed with Apple.

Apple claimed that the information posted on Think Secret in November and December of this year, and earlier, could only have been obtained by someone who had signed a confidentiality agreement with Apple.

"Apple had maintained and protected the Future Product Information contained in these two articles as trade secrets, and the information could not have been acquired by the dePlume Defendants without a breach of an Apple confidentiality agreement," Apple said in its lawsuit.

Apple is suing Nick dePlume, who owns and runs Think Secret, and 20 other unnamed individuals, some of whom Apple believes gave the unreleased product information to the Web site. The company also said that it believes dePlume is an assumed name, and that it will amend its complaint with dePlume's real name and the names of the other defendants, once they were determined.

"Apple's DNA is innovation, and the protection of our trade secrets is crucial to our success," the Cupertino, California-based company said in a statement.

Apple also said that its efforts to squelch the publication of as-yet-unannounced products was not an attempt to stifle free speech.

"These constitutionally protected freedoms, however, do not extend to defendants' unlawful practice of misappropriating and disseminating trade secrets acquired through the deliberate violation of known duties of confidentiality," the company said in its complaint.

Apple said its lawyers had repeatedly sent Think Secret letters demanding that it withdraw details of the unannounced products, which Apple said it did not do, in most cases.

dePlume told Reuters in an email Think Secret was confident it was within its rights to publish the material.

"We're confident that Think Secret's reporting is consistent with the right and privileges granted by the First Amendment," dePlume wrote. "The complaint is being reviewed, and Think Secret defers further comment until it has been analyzed."

In recent weeks, Apple already sued three men for illegally distributing test copies of the next version of its Mac OS X operating system on a file-sharing Web site and anonymous people who leaked details about new products by posting details on the Internet.

This latest lawsuit was filed in California Superior Court for Santa Clara County and seeks unspecified damages.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: apple; computer; intellectual; internet; lawsuits; legal; lowqualitycrap; property; technology

1 posted on 01/06/2005 2:48:26 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I'm waiting for a PowerBook G5! Hope they announce next week.


2 posted on 01/06/2005 2:49:44 PM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Unless Nick dePlume signed Apples confidentiality agreement, I don't see how they have a case.


3 posted on 01/06/2005 2:59:08 PM PST by bikepacker67 ("This is the best election night in history." -- DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe 11/2/04 8pm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Apple Computer has sued a popular Macintosh rumour Web site for allegedly distributing trade secrets"

Is it against the law to distribute trade secrets? After all, the web site didn’t sign the NDA. Apple’s problem is with the person who did and then talked.

Just like the left, trying to suppress free speech…

4 posted on 01/06/2005 3:10:58 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
"Unless Nick dePlume signed Apples confidentiality agreement, I don't see how they have a case."

Apple probably figures Nick dePlume can’t afford a defense.

5 posted on 01/06/2005 3:12:14 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Typical socialists...destroying the only people that love them.


6 posted on 01/06/2005 3:14:07 PM PST by FreedomFarmer (*Mischief * Managed!*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
Unless Nick dePlume signed Apples confidentiality agreement, I don't see how they have a case.

They don't have a leg to stand on. 1st Amendment.

7 posted on 01/06/2005 3:25:21 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
Macintouch is reporting that Apple has cancelled the live video stream normally available for the keynote.

After all of the hoopla about the $499 iMac, there probably wasn't going to be enough bandwidth to handle all of the viewers anyway.

8 posted on 01/06/2005 3:30:56 PM PST by HAL9000 (Spreading terrorist beheading propaganda videos is an Act of Treason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

The $499 iMac is a great idea, but I hope there are some surprises left for Macworld. I doubt there will be a PowerBook G5 before summer, but my credit card is ready.


9 posted on 01/06/2005 4:28:57 PM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Here is the web site.
barratry be gone!

10 posted on 01/06/2005 11:14:58 PM PST by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson