Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beltran has Some Taxing Decisions
ESPN.com ^ | Jan 5, 2005 | Darren Rovell

Posted on 01/05/2005 3:28:25 PM PST by Ethrane

If Beltran is looking to save a couple hundred thousand dollars, he also might want to sign before Jan. 12 and load up his contract in signing bonus money. That's because a 46-year-old loophole on signing bonuses will be closing next Wednesday.

For the rest of the American public, signing bonuses count as wages earned, with both the employer and employee having to pay taxes under FICA (the Federal Insurance Contribution Act). But in 1958, baseball players -- the exclusion for other athletes later became understood -- were exempt from FICA taxes on their signing bonuses because it was determined that no service was technically rendered for the player's bonus.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: baseball; beltran; taxes; taxloophole; taxpolicy
Where can I get me on of these "exemptions"? They sound real nice, no?

As far as:

were exempt from FICA taxes on their signing bonuses because it was determined that no service was technically rendered for the player's bonus.

If they're not performing a "service", why would anyone give them a bonus? What kind of BS is that?

Glad they're closing the loophole, but I'm tempted to ask for FICA taxes I've paid on bonuses over the past 12 years....

1 posted on 01/05/2005 3:28:26 PM PST by Ethrane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ethrane

Now Now You are not part of the priveleged class.


2 posted on 01/05/2005 3:31:28 PM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ethrane

Seeing how FICA is only paid on the first $90,000 or so of income, why is this an issue at all?


3 posted on 01/05/2005 3:39:19 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Seeing how FICA is only paid on the first $90,000 or so of income, why is this an issue at all?

This is true for the Social Security portion, but I don't believe there is a limit for the Medicare portion.

4 posted on 01/05/2005 3:42:03 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Because there is NO CAP on the Medicare portion. So 2.9% of ALL earnings are subject to tax.


5 posted on 01/05/2005 6:15:26 PM PST by bombthrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bombthrower

That is correct....there is no cap to the medicare portion.


6 posted on 01/05/2005 7:05:54 PM PST by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson