Posted on 01/05/2005 12:49:35 PM PST by hinterlander
Senate Republican Conference Chairman Rick Santorum (Pa.) joined his GOP colleagues Wednesday in a unanimous vote of support for liberal Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.) to become Judiciary Committee chairman.
Ending two months of silence, Santorum told HUMAN EVENTS there was no opposition to Specter at Wednesday's Republican Conference meeting. A day earlier, all 10 Republican members of the Judiciary Committee voted in favor of Specter, whose bid to become the panel's chairman was in doubt a mere two months ago.
The controversy stemmed from Specter's comments after winning election to a fifth term in November. When he was asked to assess President Bush's prospects for getting judges confirmed by the Senate, Specter said, "When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, overturn Roe v. Wade, I think that is unlikely." His answer set off a firestorm of grassroots activity, which eventually forced Specter to make a list of concessions to his GOP colleagues in order to win their backing.
Santorum, meanwhile, declined to offer his support. Even though he supported Specter in Pennsylvania's general and primary elections in 2004, Santorum said it would be inappropriate for him to offer a public endorsement of the embattled Specter before Republicans on the Judiciary Committee had a chance to vote. At one point, Santorum's spokesman told HUMAN EVENTS the senator was officially "undecided" on Specter's bid.
"I don't want to usurp the power of the committee by making a recommendation one way or the other," Santorum said at a November 17 press conference. "To me, this is the committee's decision. Senator Specter is meeting with the committee. He's discussing the matter with the committee. I think it would be presumptuous of me to direct the committee as to who they should appoint as their chairman. That's not being silent, that's being deferential to the process that we have in place and have had in place."
Specter takes the reigns of the Judiciary Committee on Thursday when he will host a hearing on Attorney General-designate Alberto Gonzales. Democrats have promised to turn the session into an examination of Gonzales's legal memos as White House counsel on terrorist detainees. Once the new chairman ushers Gonzalez through the committee, Specter said he plans to tackle asbestos litigation at a January 11 hearing.
Robert B. Bluey is Assistant Editor for HUMAN EVENTS
I beat you think GWB isn't one of our own either and anyone to the left of Pat Buchanan is commie traitor...
Thanks for the ping.
Don't change the subject so soon.
Do you think Specter is one of 'our own'? Yes or no?
Is Santorum? Yes or no?
If you believe Santorum is, but Specter is not -- as many of us believe, then Santorum loses credibility by supporting a liberal RINO rat instead of the conservative challenger, Pat Toomey.
Santorum sold out his professed principles for the Party label and his personal advancement. If you think Ricky boy acted honorably, it's time for you to question your own honor.
I think Rick acted to preserve the stability within the party unlike some people who like to chop of their head in order to prevent an infection from growing...
So is Santorum one or 'ours'?
Is Specter?
Please answer.
If you are a conservative, how can you not be angry with Santorum and not question his motives?
I hope he isn't presenting himself for Holy Communion.
Tort reform is dead. Specter promised that is a nonstarter. Sadly a lot of those issues are damaged, since Bush won't be able to get any judges.
I think some people would do anything for "PARTY POWER" rather than preserve their so-called principles. I am tired of standing under a "big tent" that leaks.
Is there any bigger issue than preventing the death of an innocent child?
"Big-tent" means "making pro-lifers go to the back of the bus".
Exactly. Well met, Mr. Antoninus.
I do not have a problem with the 1st tri-mester.
After all, nature probably aborts more in the 1st two months, or used to....
So you majestically confer personhood on the babe at the start of the second trimester?
How 'godlike' of you!
"So you majestically confer personhood on the babe at the start of the second trimester?"
I do no such thing. Nor do I deny a woman the right to choose. It is her body!
How righteous of you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.