Posted on 01/04/2005 10:03:18 PM PST by nickcarraway
It is hard to imagine an anti-Semite going to a Jewish doctor with a broken foot, and holding out his foot, telling him, "Here, fix this, you Jew bastard." And yet this is what is happening today, but with a different twist. It is now, although virtually unreported by the world's press, a case of, "Don't fix this, you Jew bastard. Just send money."
After the horror of the tsunami, Israel immediately leapt into a rescue mode. While most nations were dithering about and making promises, or promises to make promises, Israel sent 82 tons of medical and humanitarian aid to Sri Lanka, as well as a planeload of blood products and an additional 40 tons of supplies from private donors. On December 27 a medical team specializing in rescue work, trauma, and pediatrics was dispatched carrying medicine and baby food. A rescue-and-recovery team with specialized equipment for identifying bodies was sent, and a Health Ministry group of doctors, nurses, and members of IDF arrived in Thailand. Unfortunately, the American media, which ironically the Muslim and Arab press say is controlled by Jews, reported little of these extraordinary undertakings. The world media, along with a substantial portion of the American media, have a vested interest in continuing to cast Israel as a Palestinian murdering villain.
In addition to the help it has already sent, Israel offered to send 150 experienced military medics and support personnel to set up field hospitals. It was then that a light went off in the collective heads of at least three of the recipient nations, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and India. These countries with substantial Muslim populations apparently realized that in their condition, they would not be able to bite the hand that fed them, and, therefore, either turned down or did not respond to offers of Israeli aid. They much prefer to have Uncle Sugar pay the bills. And believe it or not, when President Bush suggested an amount that they did not feel to be sufficient, they had their public relations machines -- the same ones whose usual bill of fare is a panoply of propaganda condemning the United States, its foreign policy, and anything remotely connected with Israel -- complain that President Bush was a cheapskate and that we should throw more money at them.
It should not pass without notice that fellow Muslim nations, particularly the oil-rich Arab states, who are among the richest in the world in per capita income, yet their contributions to tsunami relief are amongst the lowest.
Certainly there should be a precondition that before these nations receive any aid, they should clearly denounce terrorism and, at the very least, discontinue the state-sponsored anti-American drivel heard in that part of the world.
The uncharitable thought crosses our minds that if the reverse were true, i.e., if Israel had suffered a catastrophe, would they come to its aid? No one, this side of a lunatic asylum, could honestly answer in the affirmative.
We believe that as a nation, we should not, as a matter of national policy -- at least until the private sector proves inadequate -- fund these relief efforts. Does this sound harsh? Let us point out several facts:
• The private sector of America voluntarily coughs up $34 billion a year in charitable aid that goes to foreign countries. This is more than virtually any other country spends for this purpose.
• To use American taxpayer money on this aid means using money that Jewish Americans and the mothers and fathers of service men and women -- the same ones whose sons and daughters are regularly reviled in the Muslim media as murderers -- believe is going to nations and regimes that are antagonistic (to be mild) to all that they hold dear.
• The proponents of foreign aid point out that this government spent over a billion dollars to assist Florida after the multiple hurricanes that struck the state. This reasoning, of course, nicely misses the point that these were American citizens helping other American citizens.
Perhaps the strongest practical reason to hold up monies is the fact that we do not know that the money will actually reach the intended recipients. In fact, history tells us the contrary. Dare we mention the Food For Oil plan? We understand U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan is urging U.S. aid. Could the fact his son is out of work have anything to do with it? After all, he has lots of experience in the field.
We are not suggesting never offering help. But let's not rush into doing so. Let's at least wait and see what those nations encouraging us to open our pocket books first do themselves.
I didn't give a .......dime.
Sorry to inform you, but you did. Your tax money is going.
So what else is new. THey hate Jews and Christians, but have no problem taking money from us.
More precisely, Bush and the Congress have decided to borrow a further 350 million dollars from China and Japan to give away to foreigners. You'll pay later, with interest.
More precisely, Bush and Congress have decided to borrow a further $350 million from China and Japan to give away. You'll pay later, with interest.
I agree with the authors whole-heartedly. It's long past the time for us to refuse to be expected to donate and donate (enthusiastically too) and, by the way, if it isn't enough we'll be told how much more to add. I like the idea of the terrorist agreement too.
Now I'm really hot...
What substantial American media is saying such a thing? What is the vested interest in doing so? Does anyone have any examples?
I'm impressed, but not surprised, with the generosity of the Israelis. The rejection of their efforts was sickening to me, and cost the victims my private contribution.
There have been other threads on this subject. This article makes at least one error, Sri Lanka is only 7% Muslim. In recent years they have had a good working relationship with Israel who has helped train some of their military. Sri Lanka had said that at the time it was a logistical problem{accomodations,etc.} I read that they were in conference with the people from Israel for some time before the decision was made.
This makes me sick. I had actually read part of this in the Chicago Sun Times. I have not given a dime and I am a very generous person. When I hear about Michael Moore, Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries giving to their Muslim brethren I might stop being angry. If Muslim countries are turning away aide from Israel, they must not need it.
No place to run...no place to hide...
Isn't Sri Lanka mostly Buddhist?
I'd heard that what they were unhappy about was that the aid team was going to comprise Israeli soldiers (IDF). It would be like the USA sending in the Marines. Politically it didn't fly.
Up until tonight (while I was reading http://diplomadic.blogspot.com/ ), I agreed with this position. However, it takes a while for most relief organizations to arrange transport and get into the region. However, the various militaries around the world have such supplies already prepackaged and ready to put onto their own ships and planes. They are uniquely prepared with the supplies and transport to deal with a situation like this.
Not that I don't agree the private sector should step up to the plate and take over ASAP.
What might be useful against the danger of future such events would be some kind of mutual aid treaties. Between similarly small countries like Sri Lanka and Israel that would make sense, and everyone would know what to expect so there are no political embarrassments. Also it would help get the UN out of the picture, which is virtually always a plus.
Didn't Giuliani reject a multi-million dollar donation after 911 from the Saudi government?
Personally I think disasters of this scaler demand you put aside your scruples as to the source of funds/teams, etc and accept for your people. But few think straight when their faced by a crisis of this magnitude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.